Jump to content


Photo

Phoenix ASAC Discipline


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 1desertrat

1desertrat

    Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • LocationEverywhere there is sand.

Posted 24 May 2010 - 07:57 PM

Let's not forget the Cadillac SAC and ASAC. They are just as bad as GG. What about the abuses and corrupt conduct of Newell and Gleysteen. The standards and rules have to be applied to ALL, agents and bosses alike. Not just those who become high profile and end up being scapegoated. Don't minimize the fact that Mr. Melson did the "right thing" and got it right with GG. Keep going Mr. Melson.


I have to disagree that Mr. Melson got it right. I still stand by my original statement that if this was an Agent, he would be fired. Even if he does not get fired, it is absolutely inappropriate to keep a sexual predator in in a leadership position. All a "pass" like this does is reinforce the smug attitude of ATF managers that they are above the rules.

What else is Curios George taking a hit on?

#2 Doc Holiday

Doc Holiday

    Regular

  • Moderators
  • 568 posts
  • LocationClassified.

Posted 22 May 2010 - 07:41 AM

Let's not forget the Cadillac SAC and ASAC. They are just as bad as GG. What about the abuses and corrupt conduct of Newell and Gleysteen. The standards and rules have to be applied to ALL, agents and bosses alike. Not just those who become high profile and end up being scapegoated. Don't minimize the fact that Mr. Melson did the "right thing" and got it right with GG. Keep going Mr. Melson.

#3 Thor God of Thunder

Thor God of Thunder

    Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 215 posts
  • LocationAsgard

Posted 21 May 2010 - 10:40 PM

I told you they would take care of GG, the predator and abuser. They should make GG register as a sex offender! Double standards, double standards, double standards! When can the employees of this fine bureau expect the executives be held to the same standard? Never?
Posted Image
For Clean Up ATF!

#4 Guest_Cornelius_*

Guest_Cornelius_*
  • Guests

Posted 21 May 2010 - 09:39 PM

THE WORD ON THE 5TH FLOOR IS THAT CURIOUS GEORGE IS THE TOP CANDIDATE TO BE THE FALL GUY SCAPEGOAT FOR SOME MORE PHOENIX FIELD DIVISION SHINANIGANS. STAY TUNED. OH, AND CURIOUS GEORGE THERES NOT A SINGLE TEAR BEING SHED FOR YOU AND YOUR TIME OFF BECAUSE YOU WERE SO S****Y TO SO MANY PEOPLE FOR SO LONG. WE HEARD YOU WERE DANCING AROUND THE DIVISION HALLWAYS WHEN YOUR ROOMIE BILLY MOVED UP? IS HE HELPING YOU OUT? OH YEAH, HE CAN'T BECAUSE HE F****D UP JUST AS BAD AS YOU DID BUT WHEN YOU ARE THE DOUBLE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR YOU JUST DON'T HAVE TO TAKE A 45 DAY LICK. TOO BAD, SO SAD. LESSON LEARNED: DON'T GET CAUGHT WITH YOUR FINGERS OR ANYTHING ELSE IN THE COOKIE JAR, SO TO SPEAK. BUT AT LEAST WILD BILL NEWELL IS GOING TO STAND BY YOU. HE'S THE DEFENDER OF ALL THAT IS RIGHT AND GOOD. JUST ASK JOE GORDON HOW THAT WORKED OUT FOR HIM. ALSO HEARD THAT WILD BILL IS ALREADY ASKING AROUND TO SEE WHAT NEW ASAC CANDIDATE IS INTERESTED IN COMING TO PHOENIX TO JOIN TEAM NEWELL.

#5 Doc Holiday

Doc Holiday

    Regular

  • Moderators
  • 568 posts
  • LocationClassified.

Posted 20 April 2010 - 08:10 PM

How is it that GG is going to take 2 days a pay period until he has satified his 45 days? Would they make that allowance for ANY other employee? If I were the female in this scenario, a suspension, removal from management AND a transfer, I would be calling them down SOOOOOOO hard for disparate treatment. You correctly identify him as a predator. He should by policy AND ethical standards be immediately removed. But when you were Billy Hoovers roomate, the rules dont apply to you. Mr. Hoover, Mr. Melson, be prepared to answer for your actions because the whirwind is coming.

#6 1desertrat

1desertrat

    Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • LocationEverywhere there is sand.

Posted 20 April 2010 - 06:18 PM

Word on the street today is that the woman agent involved has filed some type of action against ATF (how come the support staff always has better information than the agents?). Apparently she has a proposed reduction in grade from GS14 to GS13--that evaluation from GG must have been pretty good to get that 14! Apparently after all that "hard work" to get promoted, she feels it unfair that GG gets a suspension and she gets demoted. Well, it is clear how women under GG's supervision can improve their evaluations. It also shows why a woman under his supervision may not get a good evaluation should she not choose "private mentoring" sessions. I would think women in this office would be really pissed. If they get any legitimate kudos from GG all will think that they are getting "private mentoring" sessions as many of the office jokes are already alluding. Another interesting question is, what if this "mystery woman Agent" decided that her "mentoring sessions" were not voluntary but that she felt coerced by the authority of her supervisor. What if she now realizes that she was suffering PTSD all this time and now wants to file a sexual harassment claim or worse. What do we call it when sex is not consensual.....? I think not only would she NOT be demoted, but would be looking at a promotion and BIG $$$. What about ATF's liability to keep a documented predatory supervisor in place. Would not every closed door session be a potential law suit? As usual, the managers continue to circle the bowel and no one is willing to flush!

#7 Guest_Jumper_*

Guest_Jumper_*
  • Guests

Posted 15 April 2010 - 02:03 PM

The gene pool is not that small !!

From the outside, looking in, it appears like an ego trip for the manager. There is NO business reason that this manager could justify having an "inappropriate" relationship with a subordinate. If I was on the support staff, I would not want to work with such a person. He has disrespected ATF, his staff and himself. He should not supervise anyone.

ATF had better re-think how to handle this type of behavior by managers. ATF Legal Counsel could be setting themselves up for future EEO sexual harassment/hostile environment complaints! They cannot deny that this manager has a propensity to abuse his position or the people he supervises.

Your words are a little bit of a misnomer. He doesn't supervise anything. He gets in the way is a more accurate description of GG's contribution. He is an ASAC in title only, not based on experience, expertise or even effort. Ask the home invasion team that came to Phoenix last summer what GG did. He monkeywrenched everything he touched along with his trusty mentor Bill Newell and when it was all said and done the two goofballs took credit for the accomplishments of the workers they didn't support. And, Chait, Vidoli, Hoover, Melson and McMahon let their boys get away with it.

#8 BeenThereDoneThat

BeenThereDoneThat

    Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 40 posts

Posted 15 April 2010 - 11:21 AM

I personally think its karma at its best. A manager who is responsible for so much destruction of a field division now is reeping what he has sown. Problem is, he now has no one to turn to for support because everyone knows he is inept, abusive, disloyal and corrupt in his actions.Just wondering how an ASAC that commits such a heinous violation that it catches him 45 days, is still an ASAC at all.


The gene pool is not that small !!

From the outside, looking in, it appears like an ego trip for the manager. There is NO business reason that this manager could justify having an "inappropriate" relationship with a subordinate. If I was on the support staff, I would not want to work with such a person. He has disrespected ATF, his staff and himself. He should not supervise anyone.

ATF had better re-think how to handle this type of behavior by managers. ATF Legal Counsel could be setting themselves up for future EEO sexual harassment/hostile environment complaints! They cannot deny that this manager has a propensity to abuse his position or the people he supervises.

#9 Doc Holiday

Doc Holiday

    Regular

  • Moderators
  • 568 posts
  • LocationClassified.

Posted 15 April 2010 - 10:59 AM

I personally think its karma at its best. A manager who is responsible for so much destruction of a field division now is reeping what he has sown. Problem is, he now has no one to turn to for support because everyone knows he is inept, abusive, disloyal and corrupt in his actions.Just wondering how an ASAC that commits such a heinous violation that it catches him 45 days, is still an ASAC at all.

#10 Thor God of Thunder

Thor God of Thunder

    Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 215 posts
  • LocationAsgard

Posted 14 April 2010 - 03:54 PM

GG is very well on his way to becoming a DAD or AD. They will take care of him in the end. They may give him days off with all of the on the weekend so that he does not lose any pay. I have not had any scandals that come close to this crap and they will not promote me. This is how this agency works turds float to the top!
Posted Image
For Clean Up ATF!

#11 Guest_Jumper_*

Guest_Jumper_*
  • Guests

Posted 14 April 2010 - 12:41 PM

I do not agree with managements or internal affiars ablity to go back 5 or 10 years into someone's past and hammer them with discipline in the present day (with obvious exceptions to that point like theft, imbezzlement, stuff like that) but... In the case of ASAC Gillette it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. He screwed people over for years and now he's looking for support and compassion because he feels he was wronged? George, you broke everyone's "give a f%&*" for you a long time ago. Sucks to be on the bad end of a deal, huh? Now you know how all those agents you did it to felt.

#12 Valkyrie

Valkyrie

    Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19 posts
  • LocationEaster Island

Posted 11 April 2010 - 01:08 PM

1Desertrat, you are bang on target. I am tired of all the talk about integrity and accountability in ATF - there is a draft "leadership philosophy statement" floating around 99 New York and a bunch of divisions which one can guess is supposed to become part of the management mantra. Lots of us have seen this (the bosses sent it around to get comments) and it is a joke. Really pretty words that most of our "leaders" ignore. God forbid anyone wants to speak up to Ken Melson or other HBOs, unless you want a few cc's of retaliation injected somewhere painful. How about this Ken: 1. Don't lie 2. Don't cheat 3. Don't steal 4. Don't have sexual relations with subordinates 5. Integrity isn't a word it's a way of life 6. The higher you are the cleaner you need to be Everyone makes mistakes, but there are just too many people at the GS-15 and above level who think they're above the law, and they continue to get away with it. My money says you need to be more accountable and not less as you move up, but that is lost on Billy Hoover, Mark Chait, Kelvin Crenshaw, Edgar Domenech, Matt Horace, John Torres, Vanessa McLemore, Virginia O'Brien, Eleanor Loos....the list is to long to put here but we ALL know it. As for Gillette, he is a repeat offender and he should get shown the door. No way it will happen but just saying.

#13 1desertrat

1desertrat

    Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 37 posts
  • LocationEverywhere there is sand.

Posted 11 April 2010 - 12:19 PM

All eyes in the Phoenix Division are anxiously focused on ASAC George Gillett as he allegedly awaits disciplinary action concerning an "inappropriate" relationship with a subordinate while he was RAIC in Los Angeles. Word on the street is that he is expecting a 45 day "rip". Although most would agree that a supervisor who abuses his position of authority to engage in sexual predatory activities warrants serious attention. We all know that if an Agent engaged in activities (for example, like having sex on his office desk with a subordinate) determined to be "conduct unbecoming of an Agent" he would be looking for a new job. The burning question is, how does someone under an OPR investigation for years get promoted along to ASAC? The even bigger question is, WHO has covered this up and protected him for years as he continued with his promotions? Is this not a integrity issue for Giglio and Henthorn reporting? Last I checked we all had places on our evaluations for integrity and good judgement. I think all need to be watching this situation very closely to see if the "duel standard" is once again applied for an ATF manager. Will Gillett be the next highly paid "Special Assistant to the Director"? If ANY disciplinary action is taken how could ATF possibly keep someone like this in ANY management position. To do so, would be another sad commentary as to the character and integrity of our ATF leadership.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users