Southwest Border: What a Joke
#1
Posted 18 October 2012 - 08:58 AM
#2
Posted 26 April 2011 - 08:36 AM
The End of Days is coming for ATF's dirty executives.
Perjury. Obstruction of Justice. Retaliation. Fraud, Waste and Abuse. Abuse of Authority. Conduct Unbecoming. Creation of Hostile Work Enviornments. Internal Affairs cover-ups. Double-standard discipline. Failure to comply with Congressional requests. Lies to Congress. Contempt of Congress.
If the lowly scapegoats of ATF - Agents, Compliance Personell and Support Staff - had conducted themselves in the manner ATF's executives have they would be terminated and in handcuffs.
Our revolution against executive abuse has been recognized. The good will survive and be granted the opportunity to save ATF. The bad are nearing the end of their careers and it won't be on their terms. They are on the verge of terminations, criminal charges and convictions. This hits them in the only place they care about - career, promotion, resume, after-ATF employment and pension.
Bye-Bye to the corrupt bullies and hello to the new era of ATF.
#3
Posted 24 April 2011 - 07:03 AM
Slow down a minute. Instead of shit-canning our Agency even though it can be fun and correct, let’s discuss this logically, even though I agree with the conclusion that ATF does focus too much efforts on adopted cases.
What did Syracuse U’s study tell us? They have concluded that DOJ (not just ATF) weapons prosecutions have fallen to the lowest level since January 2001. They discuss the total of federal weapons prosecutions filed by the USAO, and acknowledge that prosecutions vary widely among the 90 judicial districts in the U.S. This is stating the obvious which all 1811’s know is attributed to the fact that not all AUSA’s are created equally. Each USAO has their own criteria for case acceptance. No fault to SU, but how would they begin to measure results from this? Does anyone know if this study addressed the number of cases presented by ATF in relation to the number of cases accepted for prosecution? Has the study examined reasons why AUSA’s have declined cases for prosecution? What about cases we present with multiple defendants that we feel we can charge, yet the AUSA decides to prosecute one or maybe two defendants, and not pursue all the charges we feel we can prove? It should come as no surprise that ATF has more federal firearms prosecutions than other agencies. Nothing negative for ATF on that finding. Maybe the study can be used to question what the USAO is doing in certain venues instead of trying to beat up ATF.
If someone has this study, please post a link.
According to your stats, the “common lead charge in weapons cases was Title 18 Section 922 of the U.S. Code for unlawful acts involving firearms. This single section accounted for 4 out of every five of the lead charges filed in weapons cases during the first four months of FY 2011. This charge was also ranked first both in FY 2010 and in FY 2009. Ranked second in frequency was the lead charge "Firearms; Penalties" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 924. This same charge also was second in the rankings in the previous two years.”
We can all agree that these are probably ATF’s two most frequently used charges, which unto itself is not a bad thing. Many of these charges are a result of ATF working adopted cases against serious offenders who deserve lengthier sentences. Yeah yeah, I know there are some B.S. cases that get prosecuted for the wrong reasons as you guys stated in previous posts. While local/state police can work gun cases, many AUSA‘s complain that they prefer ATF agents to handle these cases in federal court.
Many of our Enforcement programs are focused on violent felons such as Project Exile and VCIT, which congress has supported through increased funding. Our top management has simply chosen to follow the funding. Hate to admit it, but that is somewhat logical from a business perspective. The policy became work lots of quick cases, don't spend too much $, and show tangible results such as decent jail sentences. Does that help explain the situation? I realize that our Misguided Leadership has probably oversold some of our 922(g)(1) programs to Congress as well as the rank and file agents. While talented agents want to work original cases, they also work some 922(g)(1)'s. Many of us have developed these basic cases into much more because we used our investigative skills.
These same investigative skills are eroding through Misguided Leadership. It is apparent that our Academy staffers are not stressing fundamental skills such as interviewing, developing evidence, and reporting investigative findings, which are essential to making solid cases. Our Misguided Leadership has sent the wrong employees to teach Rookies @ the Academy.
Misguided leadership has over-prioritized the simpler 922(g)(1) based programs. Misguided Leadership has allowed too many self-serving, vindictive supervisors to be promoted and continue on their path of destroying the agency. Misguided Leadership in ATF has allowed inexperienced agents to test for management too soon in their careers. These same people become a GS or project manager, and then fly up to ASAC without seeing the big picture. Do you really expect any of them to have an original investigative thought if they never did this job properly? Many of these Blue Flame 14's never achieved more than mediocre investigative success, yet they received an award for a menial role on someone elses' big case. This is similar to getting a trophy because you were on a Rec league team, even if the team lost all their games. While this is great for building an 8 year old’s self-esteem, it is unrealistic and unfair for Special Agents who run these cases and the sacrifices they make in the process. Our Misguided Leadership wants us to believe they can make chicken salad with chicken shit, and that everyone should be happy about it because they toss in a free soft drink and chips. You get the picture. How can anyone expect these people to help develop and train new agents to work complex cases?
#4
Posted 24 April 2011 - 02:18 AM
"We have openly reported to Senators Leahy, Feinstein, and others with documentation and proof of Waste, Fraud and Abuse, Gross mismanagement and Internal abuses and self promoting practices which have created an institutional air of fear and reprisal."
Sir, with all due respect, approaching Senators Leahy and Feinstein may have been part of the problem. It is this citizens honest opinion that neither of these two are interested in the Constitution or Rule of Law. Unless of course that rule of law agrees with them and their ideology. I also dont believe the Republican's have the cashews to go against this Administration or the DOJ either for political reasons. Time will tell.
I have a great deal of respect for LEO's who put themselves on the line as much or more than I do as a US Soldier. And I am thankful to see that steps are being taken from within to bring honor and fidelity to the ATF and restore its imagine in the eyes of the American people. We all took oaths to protect the Constitution of the United States and operate with the rule of law, and thanks to you folks a lot of false images of the agency are being dispelled. Best of luck.
#5 Guest_Epic Failure_*
Posted 23 April 2011 - 07:14 PM
Perjury. Obstruction of Justice. Retaliation. Fraud, Waste and Abuse. Abuse of Authority. Conduct Unbecoming. Creation of Hostile Work Enviornments. Internal Affairs cover-ups. Double-standard discipline. Failure to comply with Congressional requests. Lies to Congress. Contempt of Congress.
If the lowly scapegoats of ATF - Agents, Compliance Personell and Support Staff - had conducted themselves in the manner ATF's executives have they would be terminated and in handcuffs.
Our revolution against executive abuse has been recognized. The good will survive and be granted the opportunity to save ATF. The bad are nearing the end of their careers and it won't be on their terms. They are on the verge of terminations, criminal charges and convictions. This hits them in the only place they care about - career, promotion, resume, after-ATF employment and pension.
Bye-Bye to the corrupt bullies and hello to the new era of ATF.
#6
Posted 21 April 2011 - 11:37 PM
#7
Posted 20 April 2011 - 10:38 AM
Having stated that, I learned in the 1990's that if you are going to analyze something, you have to answer four words: "What does it mean?"
In the 2000's, if you are going to analyze something, you have to answer two words: "So what?"
If ATF is going to encourage quantity over quality, the agency is doomed. I would venture to say that one case: The Oklahoma City Bombing Case, did not look impressive for the statistics. However, the American People demanded that the tragic event be investigated, solved and the people responsible be prosecuted.
Little cases cause little problems. Big cases cause big problems.
I am still not understanding how this ATF is allowed to continue functioning. No leadership and no accountable. Bad directions are issued by those who are actor in charges and the running record shows a steady decline in results. Syracuse University seems to think that your Justice has failed.
Weapons Prosecutions Decline To Lowest Level in a Decade........................
#8
Posted 20 April 2011 - 08:53 AM
Weapons Prosecutions Decline To Lowest Level in a Decade
- Number Latest Month 484
- Percent Change from previous month -7.5
- Percent Change from 1 year ago -7.9
- Percent Change from 5 years ago -28.8
The latest available data from the Justice Department show that during January 2011 the government reported 484 new weapons prosecutions. This is the lowest level to which federal weapons prosecutions have fallen since January 2001, when they were 445 at the time President George W. Bush assumed office. The comparisons of the number of defendants charged with weapons-related offenses are based on case-by-case information obtained by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) under the Freedom of Information Act from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (see Table 1). When monthly 2011 prosecutions of this type are compared with those of the same period in the previous year, the number of filings was down 7.9 percent, and down 28.8 percent from levels reported in 2006.
Monthly trends in weapons prosecutions
The decrease from the levels five years ago in weapons prosecutions for these matters is shown more clearly in Figure 1. The vertical bars in Figure 1 represent the number of weapons prosecutions of this type recorded on a month-to-month basis. The superimposed line on the bars plots the six-month moving average so that natural fluctuations are smoothed out. The one and five-year rates of change in Table 1 are based upon this six-month moving average.
- Judicial District HQ City Number Rate* Rank
- Top Ranked
- Ala, S Mobile 28 33.9 1
- N Mexico Albuquerque 60 29.9 2
- Ga, S Savannah 33 22.6 3
- Tenn, W Memphis 34 21.9 4
- Wyoming Cheyenne 11 20.2 5
- Mo, E St. Louis 55 18.9 6
- Tenn, E Knoxville 45 17.9 7
- Kansas Topeka 50 17.7 8
- Iowa, S Des Moines 30 17.6 9
- Miss, N Oxford 19 17.1 10
- Bottom Ranked
- Ill, N Chicago 25 2.7 80
- Mich, W Gran Rapids 9 2.6 81
- Ind, S Indianapolis 10 2.6 82
- Cal, C Los Angeles 46 2.5 83
- New Hamp Concord 3 2.3 84
- Ga, N Atlanta 14 2.2 85
- Mass Boston 14 2.1 86
- Cal, N San Francisco 16 2.1 87
- Penn, M Scranton 6 1.9 88
- La, M Baton Rouge 1 1.3 89
- Penn, W Pittsburgh 4 1.1 90
- * Rate is number per million population.
- Table 2. Top and Bottom Ranked Districts
- Federal Weapons Prosecutions
- FY 2011 (first 4 months)
- Top and Bottom Ranked Districts
So far during the first four months of FY 2011 there have been a total of 2,260 federal criminal weapons prosecutions filed by federal prosecutors. On average, this translates into over 7 prosecutions for each million individuals in the country. However, prosecutions vary widely among the 90 federal judicial districts in the United States. The top and bottom districts are listed in Table 2.
The state with the highest rate of federal prosecutions relative to its population was the Southern District of Alabama (Mobile) with four and a half times the rate of prosecutions compared with the average in the country. New Mexico (Albuquerque), the Southern District of Georgia (Savannah), the Western District of Tennessee (Memphis), and Wyoming (Cheyenne) round out the top five.
None of the districts with the largest cities in the country make the top 10. In contrast, those districts ranking in the bottom tier contain a number of large metropolitan areas. These include the Northern District of Illinois (Chicago) ranked 80th, the Central District of California (Los Angeles) ranked 83rd, the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) ranked 85th, Massachusetts (Boston) ranked 86th, and the Northern District of California (San Francisco) ranked 87th.
Lead Investigative Agency
In three out of every four (76%) federal prosecutions during FY 2011, the lead investigative agency was the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (see Table 3). The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) accounted for another 9 percent. State and local authorities were the third most frequent source of investigative referrals with 4.3 percent, followed closely by Immigration and Customs Enforcement with 4.1 percent. The Drug Enforcement Administration was fifth with 2.0 percent.
- All Federal Weapons Prosecutions 2,260 100.0%
- Justice - Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (formerly Treasury) 1,708 75.6%
- Justice - Federal Bureau of Investigation 211 9.3%
- State/Local Authorities 97 4.3%
- Homeland Security - Immigration and Customs Enforcement 94 4.2%
- Justice - Drug Enforcement Administration 55 2.4%
- All other 95 4.2%
The most common lead charge in weapons cases was Title 18 Section 922 of the U.S. Code for unlawful acts involving firearms. This single section accounted for 4 out of every five of the lead charges filed in weapons cases during the first four months of FY 2011. This charge was also ranked first both in FY 2010 and in FY 2009. Ranked second in frequency was the lead charge "Firearms; Penalties" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 924. This same charge also was second in the rankings in the previous two years. The third most commonly recorded lead charge were brought under the "Hobbs Act" under Title 18 U.S.C Section 1951. Charges under the "Hobbs Act" have moved up in the rankings over time. Last year the charge was fourth. In FY 2005 it was ranked sixth, while in FY 2000 it was seventh. Other lead charges among the ten most frequent weapons charges are shown in Table 4.
- All Federal Weapons Prosecutions 2,260 100.0%
- 18 USC 922 - Firearms; Unlawful acts 1,788 79.1%
- 18 USC 924 - Firearms; Penalties 115 5.1%
- 18 USC 1951 - Hobbs Act 111 4.9%
- 21 USC 841 - Drug Abuse Prevention & Control-Prohibited acts A 51 2.3%
- 26 USC 5861 - Tax on Making Firearms - Prohibited acts 49 2.2%
- 21 USC 846 - Attempt and conspiracy 34 1.5%
- 18 USC 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud US 26 1.2%
- 18 USC 1962 - RICO - prohibited activities 17 0.8%
- 18 USC 554 - Smuggling goods from the United States 11 0.5%
- 22 USC 2778 - Control of arms exports and imports 10 0.4%
- All other 48 2.1%
#9
Posted 20 April 2011 - 04:41 AM
Where I come from, the locals (real police) call us "Steal A Stat" agents! It's embarrasing as hell! It's because we have lost our focus and leadership. If an agent does 5 adopted cases, he/she gets a pat on the back. If an agent does a self initiated investigation, they get their ass chewed for not producing stats!
For all the media and citizens who read these posts, let me explain what adopted cases are. Its very simple. A local police department makes an arrest, which also has Federal jurisdiction, such as a felon in possession of a firearm (which by the way, is probably 90% of ATF cases). The case can either be filed in state court or federal court. Now, here's how we end up with these adopted cases.
1. The police department refers it to ATF, which usually only happens with big police departments because they have
a lot of these type cases. Which by the way, most ATF offices have a police officer assigned to the ATF office
to do those exact type cases, so really they are referring them to themselves, therefor no really good reason for
an ATF agent to do them. (I know, its confusing) And to add to the confusion, the police departments can file
the federal charges themselves if they want, so really, ATF is not needed in this situation.
2. The ATF agent has established a relationship with someone in the District Attorneys office, who gets these cases
from the local police department, who are filing the charges in the state system. Again, the District Attorneys
office can file and prosecute most of the cases in state court, but because we usually literally beg for these
adopted cases because they are quick and easy, the DA's office will shoot us a few, so in reality, ATF is again
not needed in this situation.
3. The United States Attorneys Office, which most of them are former assistant district attorneys and know each
other, will call their former employer, the District Attorneys Office, and ask for some adopted cases to refer to
an ATF agent. And yes, the United States Attorneys Office also pads their stats with these adopted cases, and
are required to do as many as they can get. So in this case, neither the ATF or United States Attorneys office
is needed in this situation.
Basically, the only reason ATF does adopted cases is for five reasons. The first is STATS. The second is STATS. The third is STATS. The fourth is STATS. And the fifth is a bad guy will sometimes get more time in the federal system. Oh, and I just thought of a sixth reason......STATS! I'm also giving the public an opportunity to learn to do "adopted cases". This course will be a one hour course and will be given online. The cost is minimal. The first 30 minutes will be devoted to me telling you how important the "New and improved" ATF is to you and your community. The next 15 minutes will be devoted to the loyalty you will recieve from Headquarters. The next 5 minutes will be a coffee break and finally, the last 5 minutes will be all about training YOU to do adopted cases. (certificate will be extra).
If I am misguided in anyway, please feel free to correct me, OR to add to my "reasons for adopted cases".
Once Proud makes an interesting analogy. Has anyone in ATF analyzed the statistics? If one were to take the net number of agents working cases (total agents minus those with admin jobs) and divide that number by the amount of cases prosecuted in the first quarter, 1,700, the results would be about one prosecution, or less, per agent. By identifying how many of these 1,700 prosecutions are adoption cases, the number of cases initiated by agents independent of adopting state cases would yeild a lower ratio of significant impact cases investigated by the ATF. How many agents are really out there initiating undercover cases, writing T-3's and wearing out shoe leather, as opposed to those that are cherry picking local stats? With the number of cases prosecuted by the USAO trending downward, this could lead to the reduction of funding and new hires for the future of ATF, especially in times of dwindling federal budgets and competition for scarce resources.
#10 Guest_ONCE PROUD_*
Posted 19 April 2011 - 09:17 PM
#11
Posted 19 April 2011 - 08:13 PM
I'm with you folks, but does it really matter about adoptions? If these numbers are even close, we have dropped off prosecutions 28% in 5 years. Mr. Melson,Billy,Chait, all DADs, how do you feel about these "BIGTIME" T-III cases now? We told you so. Im glad Martin and Co. got pats on the back and huge awards but at what cost? Customs is doing our job now, FBI has our jurisdictions now. Remember Sir, when we told you in writing over and over your leadership was taking you down the wrong road? Hate to say it again, WE TOLD YOU SO. Wheres Newell now with the "we seized thousands of guns and ammo" Now? Stats are just that. ATF has always been able to back a stat with a prison sentence. Not any more. And PLEASE stop saying its money. Or manpower, because its neither. Its piss poor vision and leadership.
Wow! I am ashamed of these stats.
#12
Posted 19 April 2011 - 06:55 PM
How many of these were "adoption" cases?
#13
Posted 19 April 2011 - 12:34 PM
How many of these were "adoption" cases?Negative press.
http://trac.syr.edu/...ports/crim/249/
#15
Posted 17 April 2011 - 06:05 AM
Interesting email that could have also been a relevent posting under the Gunrunner topic. This just seemed to the most logical home for it. Crazy given the time period it was sent and in context of today's issues. The highlight in red is my insertion and was not a part of the original message but is provided to focus your attention (Senator Grassley). Anybody know if this ever made it to air? We know ATF wanted it to.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sellers, Donna J.
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:00 PM
To: Kehn, Eric D.; Perot, Franceska D.; Mangan, Thomas G.; Crowley, Thomas J. (Dallas); Green, Joseph G.; Jackson, Marc S. (Atlanta); Banks, Austin R.; Rowley, Raymond G.; Spencer, John R.
Cc: Reichert, Todd H.; Wade, Drew J.; Kemp, Janice L.; Mattingly, Kathryn A.
Subject: Roker Entertainment Request
All,
Reference Al Roker Entertainment, Inc., and the ATF documentary: Due to Mr. Roker’s schedule and his interest in doing some of the interviews the optimum dates of interviewing ATF employees and filming in the DC area and selected Field Divisions has been pushed back to the second and/or third week in March. I apologize for the delay, however do ask that you still look at the cases/topics of interest and pull the appropriate case files to help OPA with planning for interviews.
Once we know the availability of Mr. Roker we can work the details for his visits to the Firearms Vault and indoor range and the Lab along with the FD filming.
I’ll be talking with the senior producers today and will try to get any advance questions and more specific areas they want to discuss relative to each case.
If you have any questions please give me a call. If I haven’t mentioned it before, MSNBC has already committed to airing this documentary beginning in June or July.
Again here are the cases/topics that will be covered in the documentary and the FD we are asking for support:
Nashville FD – Alabama Free Militia (They would like to interview the case agent; obtain any ops or surveillance video if available; talk with one of the leaders)
Houston, Dallas and Phoenix FD – Operation Gunrunner (highlight a large case using ATF video and case files; interview with ATF agents)
New York FD – The two investigations netting 10 traffickers (case files, ops and/or surveillance video if available)
Atlanta FD – Straw Purchasers (something similar to Wellons, Randolph and Prater case; small town individual seeking fast money; subject in jail or about to go to jail)
New Orleans FD – Gun Dealer Jefferson Parish (if the case is adjudicated, case file, interview case agent(s); any video)
Thanks
Donna J. Sellers
Office of Public Affairs
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
99 New York Ave., NE, Suite 5-S223
Washington, DC 20226
(202) 648-XXXX
With all of the bad press ATF has gotten lately, I would think this is not going to be positive.
#16 Guest_Simple Man_*
Posted 16 April 2011 - 10:57 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Sellers, Donna J.
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 2:00 PM
To: Kehn, Eric D.; Perot, Franceska D.; Mangan, Thomas G.; Crowley, Thomas J. (Dallas); Green, Joseph G.; Jackson, Marc S. (Atlanta); Banks, Austin R.; Rowley, Raymond G.; Spencer, John R.
Cc: Reichert, Todd H.; Wade, Drew J.; Kemp, Janice L.; Mattingly, Kathryn A.
Subject: Roker Entertainment Request
All,
Reference Al Roker Entertainment, Inc., and the ATF documentary: Due to Mr. Roker’s schedule and his interest in doing some of the interviews the optimum dates of interviewing ATF employees and filming in the DC area and selected Field Divisions has been pushed back to the second and/or third week in March. I apologize for the delay, however do ask that you still look at the cases/topics of interest and pull the appropriate case files to help OPA with planning for interviews.
Once we know the availability of Mr. Roker we can work the details for his visits to the Firearms Vault and indoor range and the Lab along with the FD filming.
I’ll be talking with the senior producers today and will try to get any advance questions and more specific areas they want to discuss relative to each case.
If you have any questions please give me a call. If I haven’t mentioned it before, MSNBC has already committed to airing this documentary beginning in June or July.
Again here are the cases/topics that will be covered in the documentary and the FD we are asking for support:
Nashville FD – Alabama Free Militia (They would like to interview the case agent; obtain any ops or surveillance video if available; talk with one of the leaders)
Houston, Dallas and Phoenix FD – Operation Gunrunner (highlight a large case using ATF video and case files; interview with ATF agents)
New York FD – The two investigations netting 10 traffickers (case files, ops and/or surveillance video if available)
Atlanta FD – Straw Purchasers (something similar to Wellons, Randolph and Prater case; small town individual seeking fast money; subject in jail or about to go to jail)
New Orleans FD – Gun Dealer Jefferson Parish (if the case is adjudicated, case file, interview case agent(s); any video)
Thanks
Donna J. Sellers
Office of Public Affairs
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
99 New York Ave., NE, Suite 5-S223
Washington, DC 20226
(202) 648-XXXX
#17
Posted 16 April 2011 - 05:43 PM
At least Mueller is being honest and its so funny because its so true. I heard FBI agents are evaluated on their ability to cultivate 2 sources per month. Thats all they want them to do. Investigations of crimes is not a priority. I have heard some say that they wished the FBI would take over ATF's jurisdiction becuase they think they would act better. Have you ever heard of the proverb that you should be careful what you wish for you may just get it and good luck.
I am no fan of the FBI but I seriously do not believe this one. I have worked some cases with them in the last 10 years and we have solved cases together. Obviously they are the masters of concealing information from other agencies but they have solved cases. They could solve a lot more if they had better relations with other agencies. Yes it was the onion.
#18
Posted 16 April 2011 - 10:10 AM
#19
Posted 16 April 2011 - 08:58 AM
#20
Posted 16 April 2011 - 08:45 AM
FBI Director Sheepishly Admits Agency Hasn't Solved Single Crime In 10 YearsApril 7, 2011 | ISSUE 47•14
WASHINGTON—In response to a probe into the bureau's operational costs, FBI director Robert Mueller timidly told Congress Wednesday that the organization he oversees has not technically solved any crimes since 2001.
Mueller says the agency has been "busy with a lot of other stuff" during the 10-year span.
After confirming that the FBI does indeed have more than 13,000 special agents deployed to investigate cases all across the country, Mueller stressed that the bureau's internal process was "complicated," and that the fact that not one case file has been closed in the past decade is not unexpected.
According to records, the last case the FBI officially solved was a Topeka, KS mail fraud offense in February 2001.
"It's hard to explain to a layman precisely how our operations work, but it's really more about analyzing crimes than it is about actually, you know, arresting perpetrators and convicting them," a fidgeting Mueller said. "It's a process, is what I'm trying to say. It isn't always so simple as 'solved' and 'unsolved.' That's been especially true this decade, I think."
"Besides, solving crimes, per se, is relatively basic," Mueller added. "We're trying to set our sights a little higher, is the thing."
According to Mueller, while the FBI has worked tirelessly over the past decade to obtain leads, collect a substantial amount of evidence, and organize a thorough criminal database, it has still failed to solve any cases, despite coming close several times.
Offering a variety of reasons for the surprising results, Mueller insisted that while many in the agency would love to be solving more federal crimes, in the end, the majority of cases usually work themselves out anyway.
"I think the problem here is that everybody is thinking too narrowly about this whole crime-solving thing," said Mueller, adding that preventing crimes from happening in the first place was much more important than solving crimes that had already been committed and that no one could do anything about at that point. "Besides, a lot of the really softball, solvable cases don't come across our desk at all. We let local law enforcement handle that stuff, and, you know, we don't want to step on their toes or anything."
"Honestly, I don't even associate the words 'FBI' and 'solving crimes' in my mind, really," Mueller added.
Mueller also said that investigative journalists basically solve 20 percent of crimes before the FBI even has a chance.
Growing increasingly frustrated, Mueller testified that in a broader sense, the problem of crime could not really be "solved" unless society were changed as a whole—a task, he said, that did not fall under the FBI's purview.
"We spend a lot of hours investigating and we have arrested suspects, but even if you convict someone, what have you accomplished?" Mueller asked. "At the end of the day, we can slap some cuffs on some creep, but that's not going to bring 15 decapitated kids back. That's not solving anything."
When asked for an accounting of the bureau's $7.9 billion budget, Mueller said a significant portion of those funds were dedicated to eliminating those who question the FBI's accounting.
Does anyone have additional information on this?
#21 Guest_Jumper_*
Posted 09 April 2011 - 03:21 PM
Does any of this surprise you? Look at the typical agents who are selected for PIO slots or go to Public Affairs as Program Mgrs. The vast majority of these guys made few if any cases besides adopted 922(g)'s. They have trouble finding their asses with both hands let alone with assistance of their significant other. Besides, they are afraid of independent thought. Most PIO's think they are entitled to these positions for the duration of their career, thus keeping them off the streets and home bound @ 5pm.
The FBI for all they are, assign decent, hard working agents as Public Affairs types. Seldom does one see overweight, sloppy FBI PIO's out there.
#22
Posted 09 April 2011 - 07:08 AM
The FBI for all they are, assign decent, hard working agents as Public Affairs types. Seldom does one see overweight, sloppy FBI PIO's out there.
Too little, too late. I have always wondered during my years at ATF why ATF does not do more press releases on the great investigations they do. FBI is in the national news it seems once a week. In 10 years, our PIO did not do one press release on all of the good work our trafficking group did. Some pretty major cases and many very dangerous bad guys taken off of the street. Weren't looking for glory, just wanted the tax paying public to know of all of our hard work.
When the the public thinks of ATF, they mostly think Waco and Ruby Ridge. FBI media gurus spun there way out of those debacles. Same across the country.
Always wondered why ATF pays an 1811 PIO $130,000 a year to do nothing.
#24
Posted 04 April 2011 - 07:37 PM
Last week a long term investigation by ATF Phoenix was concluded with volumes of arrests, evidence seizures, etc. The case displayed the good work that Phoenix Agents are capable of producing.
Oh, didn't hear about it?
That's because no self respecting media outlet is naive enough to get sucked into assisting Thomasson's attempt to cover up Gunrunner.
It's a damn shame too. Thomasson became so self important in his roll as ATF's "Media Czar" that he actually believed that the press worked for him. He has embarrassed himself and the agency in every postion he has held at ATF so this comes as no surprise.
This long term investigation was truly a phenominal case but unfortunately it came after the fast and furious disaster. From what I hear the reason there is not more media attention is because the case agent is not one of the SACs or ASACs "favorites". Honestly, I wouldn't want to be one of their "favorites" either. All I can say is that those of us outside of Phoenix know what is going on and we support the good work of the agents involved in this case.
#25
Posted 04 April 2011 - 12:48 PM
#26
Posted 28 March 2011 - 08:45 PM
Last week a long term investigation by ATF Phoenix was concluded with volumes of arrests, evidence seizures, etc. The case displayed the good work that Phoenix Agents are capable of producing.
Oh, didn't hear about it?
That's because no self respecting media outlet is naive enough to get sucked into assisting Thomasson's attempt to cover up Gunrunner.
It's a damn shame too. Thomasson became so self important in his roll as ATF's "Media Czar" that he actually believed that the press worked for him. He has embarrassed himself and the agency in every postion he has held at ATF so this comes as no surprise.
This is a classic example of why those of us outside of law enforcement are so adamant about tossing the bad eggs from the carton. While it is easy to brand some critics as anti cop, the reality is what we want to see are the successes by good agents/officers and not see their work obscured or tarnished by the self-aggrandizing, career focused truth-twisters who don't care who they step or cheat on so long as they advance with impunity. So long as these losers you all are exposing here remain unpunished, the good men and their fine work will not get the credit so well deserved. I want to have reason to LIKE the ATF as an agency, not just the individual agents I know are honest and helpful.
I have received more than one appeal, from a relatively new gun rights org, seeking signatures for a petition to Congress calling for the defunding of ATF. To be honest, even a few months ago I would have put my name on it without hesitation. On the one hand, the Gunrunner revelations could easily have pushed my buttons even more. But since I was introduced to this site, and have had the great experience of reading so much from people inside the agency who share many of the same concerns I have had (for years) on the outside, I find I am not willing to add my name to that petition at this time. I have seen a different side that, previously, I could only have hoped existed. That took a certain faith that now I have ample evidence of. In spite of the occasional voice who will, in effect, defend the agency against this kind of public exposure, I see only hope on these pages. It is not only the agents who have this venue to vent in without concern for repercussion who find great comfort here. I don't think I am the only member of the public at large who has found the same.
#27 Guest_CovertOne_*
Posted 28 March 2011 - 02:58 PM
Oh, didn't hear about it?
That's because no self respecting media outlet is naive enough to get sucked into assisting Thomasson's attempt to cover up Gunrunner.
It's a damn shame too. Thomasson became so self important in his roll as ATF's "Media Czar" that he actually believed that the press worked for him. He has embarrassed himself and the agency in every postion he has held at ATF so this comes as no surprise.
I heard a strong rumor today that Scot has been subpoenaed to appear before Congress...this should be good!
#28
Posted 22 March 2011 - 08:03 PM
#29
Posted 22 March 2011 - 07:52 AM
#30
Posted 16 March 2011 - 09:02 PM
To the Honorable Chairman Issa,
There are MANY of us who have tried to illuminate how OUR Bureau has spun out of control for the last 3-4 years. We have openly reported to Senators Leahy, Feinstein, and others with documentation and proof of Waste, Fraud and Abuse, Gross mismanagement and Internal abuses and self promoting practices which have created an institutional air of fear and reprisal. Honorable Agents by the dozens have suffered withering reprisals which quite frankly, led to and allowed the Gun Walking business to occur. Years of bullying and arrogance built by years of ZERO accountability has created an environment where the senior management of ATF believes they are above the law and untouchable. We have reported Directly to AG Holder, Directors Sullivan and Melson. We have been punished for our integrity. You will have difficulty in finding those who will step forward. We will do all that is within our power to encourage those who WILL speak the truth to come forward. Please dont leave them hanging like so many of us have been.
March 16th, 2011 letter from Congressman Darrell Issa, Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform, to ATF Acting Director Kenneth Melson:
#31 Guest_CUATF Webmaster_*
Posted 16 March 2011 - 08:45 PM
Attached Files
#32 Guest_CovertOne_*
Posted 13 March 2011 - 02:19 PM
Here is a Scot Thomason classic for you.
2007. Several Hells Angels members are on trial for Murder and RICO in Seattle. This was an FBI investigation with no ATF investigative involvement. Yet, in order to sabotage the prosecution and his own peer, then Seattle ASAC Thomason felt the need to insert a comment in the press on the very day an ATF Agent was to testify on behalf of the government as an expert on Hells Angels structure and violence.
March 12, 2007
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
Hells Angels leaders on trial today
Biker gang charged with racketeering
So far, federal prosecutors have not had much success bringing racketeering charges against Hells Angels chapters nationwide. "It's difficult to
prove, only because most of these guys are committing individual crimes only to line their own pockets, not for the gang," said Scot Thomasson of
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Seattle.
In every single RICO or CCE case that has come to trial since this public statement by Thomason ATF Agents across the country have had to fight off and defend his words in the courtroom when defense attorneys ask, "Agent read this statement. Doesn't your own agencies leadership feel that these defendants are merely individuals and not acting as a part of any type or organized criminal activity?"
An Agents only response is to say that those were the words of Scot Thomason and that he does not know what he is talking about. Thank you Spin Doctor from all of us who have had to, and will continue to have, to cover for you idiocy.
Of Special Note: Shortly after this media blunder Thomason was promoted from the ASAC Seattle to the Chief of Public and Governmental Affairs. Only in ATF people, only in ATF.
#33 Guest_Jumper_*
Posted 13 March 2011 - 11:49 AM
2007. Several Hells Angels members are on trial for Murder and RICO in Seattle. This was an FBI investigation with no ATF investigative involvement. Yet, in order to sabotage the prosecution and his own peer, then Seattle ASAC Thomason felt the need to insert a comment in the press on the very day an ATF Agent was to testify on behalf of the government as an expert on Hells Angels structure and violence.
March 12, 2007
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
Hells Angels leaders on trial today
Biker gang charged with racketeering
So far, federal prosecutors have not had much success bringing racketeering charges against Hells Angels chapters nationwide. "It's difficult to
prove, only because most of these guys are committing individual crimes only to line their own pockets, not for the gang," said Scot Thomasson of
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Seattle.
In every single RICO or CCE case that has come to trial since this public statement by Thomason ATF Agents across the country have had to fight off and defend his words in the courtroom when defense attorneys ask, "Agent read this statement. Doesn't your own agencies leadership feel that these defendants are merely individuals and not acting as a part of any type or organized criminal activity?"
An Agents only response is to say that those were the words of Scot Thomason and that he does not know what he is talking about. Thank you Spin Doctor from all of us who have had to, and will continue to have, to cover for you idiocy.
Of Special Note: Shortly after this media blunder Thomason was promoted from the ASAC Seattle to the Chief of Public and Governmental Affairs. Only in ATF people, only in ATF.
#34
Posted 12 March 2011 - 10:52 AM
#35
Posted 08 March 2011 - 08:29 AM
#36 Guest_CUATF Webmaster_*
Posted 08 March 2011 - 07:54 AM
Courtesy of CBS News:
March 4, 2011 10:31 AM
CBS News investigates "gun walking" allegations -- that ATF let thousands assault rifles and other weapons get into the hands of criminal suspects -- ATF bosses have remained largely silent. We've had ongoing requests for information and on camera interviews with both ATF and the Department of Justice since prior to our first report which aired Feb. 22.
A similar lack of response has been reported by Senator Charles Grassley, who has asked for documents and briefings from ATF. Now, we learn that after our Feb. 22 report, ATF's Chief Public Affairs officer sent an all-call internal memo to ATF Public Information Officers in an effort to "lessen the coverage of such stories in the news cycle by replacing them with good stories about ATF."
The memo asks ATF PIO's to "Please make every effort in the next two weeks to maximize coverage of ATF operations/enforcement actions/arrests at the local and regional level" in hopes it would drown out the "negative coverage by CBS News."
At the time, the memo noted "Fortunately, the CBS story has not sparked any follow up coverage by mainstream media and seems to have fizzled."
However, last night, CBS News continued reporting on this issue and will be staying on the story.
Read the full ATF internal memo below:
-----------------------------
Public Information Officers:
Please make every effort for the next two weeks to maximize coverage of ATF operations/enforcement actions/arrests at the local and regional level. Given the negative coverage by CBS Evening News last week and upcoming events this week, the bureau should look for every opportunity to push coverage of good stories. Fortunately, the CBS story has not sparked any follow up coverage by mainstream media and seems to have fizzled.
It was shoddy reporting , as CBS failed to air on-the-record interviews by former ATF officials and HQ statements for attribution that expressed opposing views and explained the law and difficulties of firearm trafficking investigations. The CBS producer for the story made only a feigned effort at the 11th hour to reach ATF HQ for comment.
This week (To 3/1/2011), Attorney General Holder testifies on the Hill and likely will get questions about the allegations in the story. Also (The 3/3/2011), Mexico President Calderon will visit the White House and likely will testify on the Hill. He will probably draw attention to the lack of political support for demand letter 3 and Project Gunrunner.
ATF needs to proactively push positive stories this week, in an effort to preempt some negative reporting, or at minimum, lessen the coverage of such stories in the news cycle by replacing them with good stories about ATF. The more time we spend highlighting the great work of the agents through press releases and various media outreaches in the coming days and weeks, the better off we will be.
Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any significant operations that should get national media coverage, please reach out to the Public Affairs Division for support, coordination and clearance.
Thank you,
Scot L. Thomasson
Chief ATF Public Affairs Division, Washington, DC
Desk 202-648-XXXX
Cell 206-XXX-XXXX
#37
Posted 05 March 2011 - 10:52 AM
For Clean Up ATF!
#38
Posted 03 March 2011 - 07:53 PM
#39 Guest_microscope_*
Posted 03 March 2011 - 05:56 PM
#40
Posted 02 March 2011 - 07:47 AM
#41 Guest_Epic Failure_*
Posted 01 March 2011 - 11:29 PM
Demand that ATF produce and certify documents that list the crime scene recovery location and the crime event of every single gun that has been allowed to hit the streets since the inception of project gunrunner and recovered in any type of crime. That needs to include the New Orleans, Houston, Dallas, Phoenix and Los Angeles Field Divisions.
ATF has this information within their databases and it can be accessed quickly and easily using specific search parameters. Melson brags to congress on ATF's assistance to Mexico in establishing the Mexican e-Trace program. He claims ATF has spent years and millions of dollars helping Mexico establish the same ballistics matching technology that is used by ATF in the U.S. let him show you how well the systems work by generating for you the information that they are designed to produce.
There is also something called a "time to crime" report. You need that. It tells what amount of time has elapsed from when a gun is first purchased until it is recovered in a crime. A short time-to-crime indicates that the gun was purchased for the specific intent of being used in a crime and that the criminals wasted no time in doing so.
ATF agents use this information all the time as a part of an intelligently conducted trafficking investigation. The problem here is that ATF never imagined that its lead development hardware, software and programs would be utilized to show the failures of their operations. You are going to be infuriated with what you find.
Double check ATF's work. It will most likely be deceptive. You've already seen you cannot trust them to tell you the truth. Then demand that Melson himself answer for the findings instead of allowing him to insult you by sending a flunky to be his bag man.
Thousands of guns have been "walked" and gotten into the open during gunrunner. People don't commit gun trafficking crimes for an end user who is a common citizen wanting an AK-47 for home protection. By the very design of the straw purchaser/lying and buying crime schemes, those guns are intended for the hands of persons who have a predisposed violent and murderous and criminal intent and need firearms to further their crimes.
There is an extraordinary amount of crime events and homicides that you do not know about, and will not know about, unless you demand the reports and make Melson himself certify their accuracy.
If you really want to put an end to the crimes committed by ATF management in name of the American people and while wasting our tax dollars, this is where you start.
#42
Posted 30 January 2011 - 07:34 PM
#43 Guest_CUATF Webmaster_*
Posted 24 January 2011 - 04:39 PM
Attached Files
#44
Posted 23 January 2011 - 10:11 AM
#45
Posted 19 January 2011 - 10:17 PM
#46
Posted 30 November 2010 - 08:18 AM
#47
Posted 29 November 2010 - 08:09 PM
#48
Posted 26 September 2010 - 09:44 AM
The SW Border initiative has always been a joke. New Mexico, Texas, Arizona and Los Angeles have never committed to the idea of stopping the flow of firearms into Mexico. Monies allocated to this mission have misspent and agents in these divisions have been instructed to report any incident/investigation, no matter how loosely related to Gun Runner. It seems that ATF management (SACS, ASAC,DAD,AD and the DD) would rather lie to congress, cook the books, alter the numbers instead of DOING THE JOB.
Not surprisingly the scapegoating has started. As many of us have talked about and shared here on CUATF, this agency and our leadership does not posses the ability to take responsibility for ANY of their actions. NEWS flash DD Melson; the criticisms in the OIG gunrunner report are NOT attributable to the field. We have NOT been included in the formation of any gunrunner strategies. You and yours created this mess. Did you ever wonder why you are kept in the dark and have had minimal DIRECT contact with the ATF employees executing our SW Border strategy? Have you asked yourself why Billy,Chait,Newell,Torres and Webb have told you how wonderful we are doing when that couldn't be further from the truth. Ronald Reagan ALWAYS double checked info his advisers gave him because he KNEW the self serving nature of a Bureacracy. Wonder why meetings with the Mexico Attache were cancelled by Billy and Chait? Is it because what he would tell you would totally contradict what your Executive staff is telling you? Haven't we learned that scapegoating doesn't do anything but create problems in the Bureau? When is just ONE senior manager going to say "the buck stops here", I am responsible, and quit making excuses and spinning things and playing the blame game? We (the agents,inspectors and clerical staff) are about the mission. Your bosses are about media headlines, management bonuses, promotions and retirement connections. 2 Simple questions to ask yourself Mr. Melson, #1 how many of your SACs or SES' have walked into your office and said, "that's my bad boss, I totally screwed the pooch on that one"? #2 If the answer is none, the why are they still in place? Stop blaming hard working agents who have poor leadership and start fixing the problems. I know Ms. Loos and Bacon regularly advise you the agents are always wrong, but I would submit to you, where theirs smoke there's fire.
Final thought; could the money used to send a group to Dublin, Ireland been used to brainstorm, bring in some agents for a round table and tighten up gunrunner at the enforcement level? Is Dublin, a gunrunner priority? PS I thought we were broke and making cuts.
#49
Posted 26 September 2010 - 08:26 AM
#50
Posted 23 September 2010 - 10:57 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users