1 reply to this topic

[Jaime3]

Why does the EEO office WITHIN ATF allowed to give false information and it's blown off?

This is a component that should be outside the Agency. The false information given, can be proven. EEO conversing with Management on how to LEGALLY retaliate, can be proven. Management conversing with Attorneys on how to LEGALLY retaliate against employees, can be proven. What else need to be proven?
Why are these people getting paid?

[Jaime3]

After the Attorney General was hit with Contempt charges, the US Federal Operations Office contacted another ATF person who showed how ATF improperly locked her into specific dates during an EEO investigation. Not only did the EEO investigator put in the ROI that the office issues were going on prior to the lock-in date, but she requested a Supplemental Investigation when requesting a hearing at the EEOC. She has emails and also recorded the EEO counselor stating how people aren't locked in those dates. Good for her!

But anyone who has gone through the EEO process knows ATF uses this as a reason to try and dismiss claims. So not only is Judge being watched on this incident, the EEO office is getting ready to be in a world of hurt. Remember, they are not allowed to influence the case, one way or the other.

ATF Attorneys think Washington D.C. has their back, but DC is feeding them the rope! If they don't settle her case, I smell a Class Action suit!