To all: If I was unclear, let me set this straight. It WAS NOT Vido I was referring to as to media policy violation. It was L A SAC Torres. He disclosed HIGHLY secretive investigative techniques that very specifically did, can and will expose current and future agents to potential harm. He did so with his usual grandstanding fashion and openly in a major newspaper. Apparently w/o consquence, as he is still a SAC. As to Mr. Vido, his major issue is smoke and mirror management, lack of candor and lying under oath. Yes he also remains a SAC. I hope this clears this matter up. Mr. Vido is the Prince of I don't know and I don't recall. Only to be rivaled by the King of lapsing memory, newly appointed SAC Mike Gleysteen. Remember his deposition? 50+ I don't know and I don't recall related to major Bureau policies. That's who we want for a SAC. Or do we?
It should not be a big shock that ATF maintains two sets of rules, one for the working agent and another for the 14's and 15's.
It also should not be a surprise that a SAC would put working agents in unneeded danger in order to further the SAC's career. Torres probably had no idea he was giving away trade secrets, since most managers in ATF are clueless about what the street agent actually does. The majority of ATF's "leadership" is interested in punching their own ticket and moving on to bigger and better things for themselves. They also seem real concerned with your management logs being updated, if your learnatf training is up to date and if your gas receipts are turned in on time. Most of the ATF managers could care less about putting criminals in jail,but they really get worked up if your shirt doesn't have a collar.
Mr. Melson, if you want to fix ATF, quit talking and start cleaning house, unless you too are just punching your ticket and moving on to bigger and better things.