Grapevine
#51
Posted 30 July 2012 - 10:38 AM
#52
Posted 28 July 2012 - 11:19 AM
Now, if Jones sends the likes of Kelvin, well, we are back to scaring these people and not a dime should be spent. If Jones’ sends our most impressive, which he should be doing, I still say it’s the smart thing to do.
Maybe you just don’t understand the difference between a Boy Scout and an Eagle Scout. It would be like comparing a hallway monitor to a Navy Seal. ATF is way past the point where an everyday hallway monitor will be sufficient.
Doc Holiday, on 28 July 2012 - 09:19 AM, said:
#53
Posted 28 July 2012 - 09:19 AM
26 years and counting, on 27 July 2012 - 09:54 AM, said:
Finally it seems as if Jones has gotten something right. Finally.
#54
Posted 27 July 2012 - 09:54 AM
Finally it seems as if Jones has gotten something right. Finally.
Doc Holiday, on 26 July 2012 - 08:58 PM, said:
CO, to play at some Boy Scout jamboree or some such foolishness. I've heard
20-25 NRT folks, 4 medics, a PIO, and a partridge in a pear tree, but I'm not
sure about the tree. The B. Todd is supposed to make an appearance, but that's
not for sure.
#55
Posted 26 July 2012 - 08:58 PM
The following is from a Highly reliable source.
OK, just learned that these 120 day details are being funded by extra money
coming from DOJ, so we're going to keep running them. Makes perfect sense: ATF
will be the new Violent Crime Bureau; Front Line initiative is the big PR wave
to get ahead of the OIG report.
120 day details are to show that we are specifically targeting violent criminals nationwide; money from DOJ funds this PR spin to help get ahead of media circus from OIG report and to shelter Holder while under contempt citation. Low agent morale is no impediment, since the over arching plan is to just put on a show despite impact or cost. Couple that with the spike in New Orleans murder rate right in the middle of the ATF detail
there, and you can pretty much show that despite the fiscal costs at a time of budgetary belt tightening, the point is to prepare a media plan in preparation for the OIG report. I don't think you'll be able to show any positive impact on violent crime as a result of these details in any city targeted.
Also, this "Frontline" bullshit is killing morale nationwide. Divisions have their
own ideas about what and how to implement it, and the agents are just winding up
pissed on and pissed off. GA, NY, FL and KS are my sources.
SAC Sweetow is apparently heir apparent for some HQ job fairly soon. ASAC Delvecchio is
pining for the west coast, and will be putting in for some supervisor job out there as soon as its announced as His Chief Counsel wife and will be putting in for some Chief Counsel supervisor job out there (probably Larry Nichols old job), as soon as its announced. Both will be good riddance when gone from Atlanta at this point.
Lastly, we have about 30 people, agents, IOI's, etc., detailed to Ft. Collins,
CO, to play at some Boy Scout jamboree or some such foolishness. I've heard
20-25 NRT folks, 4 medics, a PIO, and a partridge in a pear tree, but I'm not
sure about the tree. The B. Todd is supposed to make an appearance, but that's
not for sure.
Storm, on 25 July 2012 - 05:32 PM, said:
There are reports that the Special Agent in Charge of Atlanta, GA is a repeat discriminator and retaliates against employees that file EEO complaints or any complaint for that matter. How many more complaints need to be filed before this is not tolerated? There are reports that when the Special Agent in Charge of Washington, DC was announced his employees received condolences from their fellow ATF employees. Aside from the crazy stories that are already out there, we will see what else this madman does. There are reports that the Special Agent in Charge of Seattle, WA is being targeted because of the supervisor that stole the ATF's money. Has he been held responsible yet? There are reports that the Fast and Furious Report will be out in August. There are reports and then there are REPORTS....stay tuned
#56
Posted 25 July 2012 - 05:32 PM
There are reports that the Special Agent in Charge of Atlanta, GA is a repeat discriminator and retaliates against employees that file EEO complaints or any complaint for that matter. How many more complaints need to be filed before this is not tolerated? There are reports that when the Special Agent in Charge of Washington, DC was announced his employees received condolences from their fellow ATF employees. Aside from the crazy stories that are already out there, we will see what else this madman does. There are reports that the Special Agent in Charge of Seattle, WA is being targeted because of the supervisor that stole the ATF's money. Has he been held responsible yet? There are reports that the Fast and Furious Report will be out in August. There are reports and then there are REPORTS....stay tuned
#57
Posted 22 July 2012 - 11:18 PM
Iceman, on 22 July 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:
#58
Posted 22 July 2012 - 08:48 AM
microscope, on 21 July 2012 - 12:33 PM, said:
The ATF agents, first and mid-level supervisors on scene responded and performed to the very highest standards of law enforcement to include going above and beyond when requested to tag and bag corpse's in the theater after the FBI's evidence recovery team was called off the task because they were trampling valuable crime scene evidence.
Now the good part. Obama's choice to be the Director of ATF, Andy Traver, now the SAC in Denver could not be found until 7am the morning after a national catastrophe took place in his own town at 12:30 the night before. Wouldn't answer his phone. This is not entirely clear but either responding managers were preparing to, or actually did, send a car to his house to advise him of what had occured. When he ulitmately showed he had is PIO driving him around to meetings as a personal chauffeur.
You can not make this stuff up. How does that fit into Jones's Changecast message when he talked about the demands he was going hold his managers to? Traver failed in the face of a world wide event that happened only miles from his home and missed the mark on every one of Jones's expectations. This is not an ordinary run of the mill field SAC. It's the guy the White House wanted to run ATF!
Like one agent recently stated, "Traver couldn't get Chicago right let alone the agency."
#59
Posted 21 July 2012 - 12:33 PM
The ATF agents, first and mid-level supervisors on scene responded and performed to the very highest standards of law enforcement to include going above and beyond when requested to tag and bag corpse's in the theater after the FBI's evidence recovery team was called off the task because they were trampling valuable crime scene evidence.
Now the good part. Obama's choice to be the Director of ATF, Andy Traver, now the SAC in Denver could not be found until 7am the morning after a national catastrophe took place in his own town at 12:30 the night before. Wouldn't answer his phone. This is not entirely clear but either responding managers were preparing to, or actually did, send a car to his house to advise him of what had occured. When he ulitmately showed he had is PIO driving him around to meetings as a personal chauffeur.
You can not make this stuff up. How does that fit into Jones's Changecast message when he talked about the demands he was going hold his managers to? Traver failed in the face of a world wide event that happened only miles from his home and missed the mark on every one of Jones's expectations. This is not an ordinary run of the mill field SAC. It's the guy the White House wanted to run ATF!
Like one agent recently stated, "Traver couldn't get Chicago right let alone the agency."
#60
Posted 20 July 2012 - 08:20 PM
Did ya know an employee out west got a 5 day suspension recently for a normal dispute with another employee? Remember Jays 5 days off for calling an incompetent an incompetent? What about the guy who posted a public article outlining line by line how Joe Riehl with Martin and others help, COMPLETELY tanked the efficiency and effectiveness of our Arson and Explosive programs? He didn't write the article and it had been posted for over a year. When Riehl was promoted (SERIOUSLY), that kid got days off for the article posted for a year before. But Thomasson is still in a boss job, Ford is still a boss. This is rich, Richardson and Crenshaw are still bosses.
Those of you who make an oversight or legitimate mistake BEWARE. But if you lie to congress, steal or misappropriate taxpayer funds, discriminate and retaliate, Mr. Jones WASN'T threatening you. Mr. Jones, are you starting to see how your specific Changecast #8, was not a leap, hell it wasn't a shuffle to the obvious conclusion everyone in the country is talking about? The new "philosophy seems to be, (Not Officially Coined Yet), "Lead from the bottom or don't lead at all"
Sandy Davis, on 19 July 2012 - 08:55 AM, said:
In Grassley's office:
Jason_Foster@Judiciary-Rep.Senate.Gov
In Issa's office:
Ashok M. Pinto
202-225-2382 fax
Ashok.Pinto@mail.house.gov
In Lamar Smith's office:
Todd.Washam@mail.house.gov (Fax 202.225.5102)
Bart.Forsyth@mail.house.gov
#61 Guest_Sandy Davis_*
Posted 19 July 2012 - 08:55 AM
In Grassley's office:
Jason_Foster@Judiciary-Rep.Senate.Gov
In Issa's office:
Ashok M. Pinto
202-225-2382 fax
Ashok.Pinto@mail.house.gov
In Lamar Smith's office:
Todd.Washam@mail.house.gov (Fax 202.225.5102)
Bart.Forsyth@mail.house.gov
Jay A. Dobyns, on 18 July 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:
The problem is the whistleblowers I know have all played by the rules and presented complaints to first, second and third level supervisors, the Ombudsmans office, Internal Affiars, the EEOC, the OIG and OSC, Congress and finally the media. None that I am personally aware of immediately jumped tough and put themselves in front of a reporter or camera. What Acting Director Jones does not discuss is the utter lack of interest when whistleblowers follow the rules. He talks as if the process is balanced but the truth is it is a one-way street. You get NO attention or concern until an executive is embarrassed in the media. Not even an acknowlegement of a complaint beyond a boilerplate email - thank you for your interest; we are very concerned; blah, etc.
Lump the Changecast message with the institutional history of ATF retaliations (still ongoing). Then add in guys like Thomasson who openly state their intent to trainwreck whistleblowers (when interviewed on his statement claimed that he "did not know and does not care"). Take the managers in Phoenix who attacked and derailed the lives of honest agents like Forcelli and Canino and have not been held accountable (Thomasson's plan being enacted). And then top it off with a "no oversight" policy for the Office of Chief Counsel who has an undeniable track record of whistleblower ambushes. What does that leave you?
An agency where the fear of speaking the truth will leave you in such a demolished state of career, reputation, family and finance that any agent with a brain cell is going to shut up, keep their heads down, let someone else get their head chopped off, and continue to work on (more like survive) in a culture where no one of influence is willing to hear the truth. ATF's acomplishments have historically been made in spite of our executives, not because of them. Is every executive bad? No. Come on. No one is saying that. But the ones who are, they're out of control bad and the good ones don't do a damn thing to reign in their peers for fear that someday the dirty boss could be their boss and the retaliation could come down on them. ATF executives are masters of playing it safe.
This is of note: I have repeatedly begged for the HQ executives to meet with me to discuss my dispute. The repeated answer: "We can't because the attorneys won't let us." The attorneys won't let the Director or Deputy Director talk to an ATF employee? And Jones and Brandon accept that! They need OCC's permission to do their jobs? No overruling of the attorney to say - "thank you for the counsel but this is MY agency and I will talk to anyone in it about any topic I chose."?
Nope. If it is happening to me it is surely happening to dozens of others like me. Now you decide who calls the ball around here.
#62
Posted 18 July 2012 - 06:09 PM
Attached Files
#63
Posted 18 July 2012 - 03:46 PM
#64
Posted 18 July 2012 - 03:40 PM
The problem is the whistleblowers I know have all played by the rules and presented complaints to first, second and third level supervisors, the Ombudsmans office, Internal Affiars, the EEOC, the OIG and OSC, Congress and finally the media. None that I am personally aware of immediately jumped tough and put themselves in front of a reporter or camera. What Acting Director Jones does not discuss is the utter lack of interest when whistleblowers follow the rules. He talks as if the process is balanced but the truth is it is a one-way street. You get NO attention or concern until an executive is embarrassed in the media. Not even an acknowlegement of a complaint beyond a boilerplate email - thank you for your interest; we are very concerned; blah, etc.
Lump the Changecast message with the institutional history of ATF retaliations (still ongoing). Then add in guys like Thomasson who openly state their intent to trainwreck whistleblowers (when interviewed on his statement claimed that he "did not know and does not care"). Take the managers in Phoenix who attacked and derailed the lives of honest agents like Forcelli and Canino and have not been held accountable (Thomasson's plan being enacted). And then top it off with a "no oversight" policy for the Office of Chief Counsel who has an undeniable track record of whistleblower ambushes. What does that leave you?
An agency where the fear of speaking the truth will leave you in such a demolished state of career, reputation, family and finance that any agent with a brain cell is going to shut up, keep their heads down, let someone else get their head chopped off, and continue to work on (more like survive) in a culture where no one of influence is willing to hear the truth. ATF's acomplishments have historically been made in spite of our executives, not because of them. Is every executive bad? No. Come on. No one is saying that. But the ones who are, they're out of control bad and the good ones don't do a damn thing to reign in their peers for fear that someday the dirty boss could be their boss and the retaliation could come down on them. ATF executives are masters of playing it safe.
This is of note: I have repeatedly begged for the HQ executives to meet with me to discuss my dispute. The repeated answer: "We can't because the attorneys won't let us." The attorneys won't let the Director or Deputy Director talk to an ATF employee? And Jones and Brandon accept that! They need OCC's permission to do their jobs? No overruling of the attorney to say - "thank you for the counsel but this is MY agency and I will talk to anyone in it about any topic I chose."?
Nope. If it is happening to me it is surely happening to dozens of others like me. Now you decide who calls the ball around here.
VINCENT A CEFALU, on 18 July 2012 - 02:31 PM, said:
http://washingtongua...wer-video-chill
#65 Guest_leaderofthetards_*
Posted 18 July 2012 - 03:26 PM
VINCENT A CEFALU, on 18 July 2012 - 02:31 PM, said:
http://washingtongua...wer-video-chill
"Choices and consequences" my ass Mr. Jones. Do you have any idea how disingenuous you sound given that YOU BROUGHT KELVIN BACK TO WORK AS A SAC????? Or weren't Kelvin's choices deserving of any consequences? I cannot wait to see you attempt to explain that one while at the same time trying to justify letting your managers suspend every agent who sneezes. Especially those agents involved in exposing your regime's nasty antics. And by the way Mr. Jones, you may want to ask Julie Torres what comments she has made about going after the CleanUp posters. I'm thinking that's probably not going to look too good in the light of day either. Bummer huh Jones?
#66
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:31 PM
http://washingtongua...wer-video-chill
#67 Guest_madea_*
Posted 17 July 2012 - 05:42 AM
Limenerd, I’d like to point out that CleanUp is a place where you can freely state your opinion, just as you have stated yours. Here’s my opinion... this isn’t little league where everyone gets an affectionate pat on the behind and a trophy. This is real life where agents are having their lives torn apart, ATF has lost ALL credibility, the AG has been held in contempt, and people are dead. I don’t give a rat’s ass if I have hurt Jerry’s feelings any more than he cares that his ignorant dribble gives me a headache.
But just you know Jerry Sharpe, the purpose of CleanUp is not to act as cheerleader. The purpose is to expose misconduct and corruption, then to apply pressure so that “leaders” like Toad and Tom do the right thing. Do you think that Tom was sitting around his cushy office one day and came up with the idea to appoint a new ombuddy? Do you think Jones was concerned about the two agents who were cleared and then put back to work? Do you think it was Tom’s idea to appoint a new BDO who is not an attorney? Or do you think that just maybe these changes were implemented because some of us STAY ON THEIR ASS?
It is those like Vince who not only ask the tough questions, but PUSH for answers, who are responsible for any changes. Why do you think Vince was blocked from the SF Town Hall? Why do you think ATF has blocked my number? Why do you think the DOJ placed a block on CleanUp? Block, block, block, block, block. Do you think all these blocks are because they want to do the right thing? No Jerry, they do not. Just like you, they want us to shut up. And by the way Jerry Sharpe, don’t forget it was on CleanUp that F&F was exposed for the first time.
So you see Lime, we aren’t here to hold Jerry’s hand. We have more important things to do.
#68
Posted 16 July 2012 - 07:33 PM
JEROME SHARPE, on 15 July 2012 - 11:22 AM, said:
Full disclosure: i've known the DD for my whole career and have worked for him (as a street agent) as both an ASAC and SAC, so I'm not objective. But I can tell you unequivocally he is an extremely hard working, experienced, dedicated "street agent" oriented guy, and above all a man of integrity. Pisses me off to see him and Mr. Jones dissed here.
In my 23 years as an agent, I have never had reason to be optimistic about the top ATF management trying to do the right thing. Until now. I believe these guys are actively advocating for better bosses and trying to change the in-bred messed up culture of ATF Supervision, a soup sandwich that's been the norm for years and years. A huge job, admittedly. But they are truly trying to make it happen. Some people here need to give them a chance.
Be Safe,
Jerry Sharpe
When someone goes back and makes the victims (and that is the right word) of those tyrant, incompetent and abusive first line supervisors whole again instead of just shuffling them around (seems another institution tried that method)then I'd give them a chance.
#69
Posted 16 July 2012 - 07:21 PM
As you may know, our new Acting Director Mr. Jones and select staff are traveling the country holding Town Hall meetings for what they have said is an effort to encourage and improve communication, as well as get input from all of us. And as some of you know, I have had a public presence in questioning and pointing out significant and dangerous practices by management of ATF, and have been used as a public face for other ATF personnel who wanted to remain anonymous involving cases and initiatives which have gone horribly wrong and in more than one instance cost innocent lives. We all know we cannot stand by and let ATF disintegrate, and Congress apparently now knows it too.
You need to know that when the Town Hall was scheduled to come to the San Francisco Field Office, I contacted San Francisco Management staff to advise I would like to participate. We had all been advised in writing by one of the ASAC’s that “All active employees (which I am) are encouraged to attend.” I was also advised that all questions and concerns must be submitted in writing ahead of time, so that ATF would have the questions or concerns by close of business one week in advance. So I submitted my questions. I drove (on my own dime) over 200 miles to attend. At close of business on July 10, (the night before) I was advised I would not be allowed to attend. You may want to know about this action by ATF against one of ATF’s so-called “whistleblowers.” I have said nothing publicly.
The Town Hall may be coming to your town. In the hopes that these concerns are shared across the country, ANY of you may ask any such question on my behalf or use them on your own, and yes, do you do so at some risk? Of course. I know this all too well. It turns out that ANY field division that requires questions in advance, is doing so against the subsequent direction from the Directors staff. I have emails from the Acting Director’s staff to the San Francisco ATF management staff,to NOT require questions in advance. They did so anyway, and never rescinded the requirement. These are the questions I would have asked, if allowed. If you get any answers, or even non-answers, please post them for everyone. Thanks.
Questions for Acting Director B. Todd Jones
1) Why are managers who were in charge or substantively responsible for the failure of major ATF programs still managers and, in some cases, promoted?
2) Why does there seem to be such a gaping disparity and accountability of treatment by ATF management between managers who are known to have abused policies and have violated ethics and integrity standards and field agents? For example, field agents are being reprimanded for relatively insignificant violations while the more egregious conduct of managers is left unaddressed.
3) Why is ATF not in compliance with EEOC laws and rules regarding the timely processing of complaints? What is ATF planning to do to correct this issue and to come into compliance?
4) Why have those managers who have publicly threatened or acted against whistleblowers and other complainants not been reprimanded or fired?
5) What is the ATF doing to protect its whistleblowers and to encourage an environment where an agent feels he or she can bring forward issues without retaliation?
6) What observations and/or action items did you gather from the recent Government/OPM survey which concluded that the ATF had the least trusted and respected leadership in the U.S. law enforcement community? What do you plan to do about this issue that can be measured by the field? When do you plan to take action on this issue?
7) Why were the Field Agents Advisory Panels criticisms and recommendations regarding the ATF Chief Counsel's Office deleted from the ATF website, thus preventing public view and accountability? Are the abuses of ATF Chief Counsel's Office no longer subject to the same scrutiny as other ATF Directorates?
8) Why is ATF leadership not protecting ATF's jurisdiction, such as our explosive jurisdiction, and allowing the agency to be minimized?
9) Why did ATF leadership allow a process to buy out senior agents, inspectors, and employees when the agency was already lacking experience and competencies? Would it not have been better to reduce the top heavy management ranks that were underperforming and lacked accountability?
10) Our agency has been in existence and a highly functioning agency for 40 years. Why, 8 months into our “new” leadership is the field learning that ATF almost has a management philosophy? When will the philosophy be acted upon?
26 years and counting, on 16 July 2012 - 03:36 PM, said:
#70
Posted 16 July 2012 - 03:36 PM
JEROME SHARPE, on 15 July 2012 - 11:22 AM, said:
#71 Guest_Sandy Davis_*
Posted 16 July 2012 - 01:29 PM
I have seen too much and worked too hard to have much patience with the Jerrys of ATF. And, I think I can safely speak for Kay in this instance, neither one of us is getting paid to tip toe around Jerry's feelings and neither of us is running for Ms Congeniality. I dare say you could find anyone who has had to deal with ATF much who is warm and fuzzy. ATF has a way of slapping the warm and fuzzy right out of you.
limestonenerd, on 16 July 2012 - 12:14 PM, said:
#72
Posted 16 July 2012 - 12:14 PM
#73 Guest_Sandy Davis_*
Posted 16 July 2012 - 10:06 AM
And please Jerry, don’t go away. I would like for you to lay out what Jones and Brandon have done to benefit this agency since they took control. They are no longer “new leaders”. They have been in place plenty of time to have done something else right other than the clearing of the two agents. I’m sure that took all of an afternoon. They have plenty of power and resources to accomplish a lot. Sadly, they have chosen to use their power and resources to retaliate against anyone who refuses to fall in line with their propaganda. Of course, this works out well for you though. I hope you get whatever promotion or transfer you are working towards.
Again Jerry, please give me a list of the things Jones and Brandon have gotten right. I give you my word I will acknowledge their effort. You can post these things under “They just will not do the right thing”. If you can get the list going again, I will change the title of the thread back. I’m looking forward to seeing that list.
JEROME SHARPE, on 15 July 2012 - 11:22 AM, said:
Full disclosure: i've known the DD for my whole career and have worked for him (as a street agent) as both an ASAC and SAC, so I'm not objective. But I can tell you unequivocally he is an extremely hard working, experienced, dedicated "street agent" oriented guy, and above all a man of integrity. Pisses me off to see him and Mr. Jones dissed here.
In my 23 years as an agent, I have never had reason to be optimistic about the top ATF management trying to do the right thing. Until now. I believe these guys are actively advocating for better bosses and trying to change the in-bred messed up culture of ATF Supervision, a soup sandwich that's been the norm for years and years. A huge job, admittedly. But they are truly trying to make it happen. Some people here need to give them a chance.
Be Safe,
Jerry Sharpe
#74 Guest_madea_*
Posted 15 July 2012 - 01:52 PM
By the way Jerry Sharpe, the new ombuddy did indeed start to do the right thing and actually helped a couple of employees. At first. However, like all the rest, he got the big picture and has now fallen in line. Just try to get help from him now Jerry Sharpe. Oh, and please let me know if he actually does help someone again. I will be the first to acknowledge his effort. I was the first to publicly acknowledge his effort in the beginning right here on CleanUp and I will be quick to do so again.
And lastly Jerry Sharpe, I’m not sure where you’ve been but you obviously have some catching up to do. You see, we did give Todd and Tom a chance. Several of them in fact. And what do we have to show for it? More reprisals, more coverups, and more promotions of the likes of Larry Ford.
Now Jerry Sharpe, if you have the guts to come back on here and defend either Kelvin or Larry, please go right ahead. Otherwise shut up. This level of ignorance gives Medea a headache.
JEROME SHARPE, on 15 July 2012 - 11:22 AM, said:
Full disclosure: i've known the DD for my whole career and have worked for him (as a street agent) as both an ASAC and SAC, so I'm not objective. But I can tell you unequivocally he is an extremely hard working, experienced, dedicated "street agent" oriented guy, and above all a man of integrity. Pisses me off to see him and Mr. Jones dissed here.
In my 23 years as an agent, I have never had reason to be optimistic about the top ATF management trying to do the right thing. Until now. I believe these guys are actively advocating for better bosses and trying to change the in-bred messed up culture of ATF Supervision, a soup sandwich that's been the norm for years and years. A huge job, admittedly. But they are truly trying to make it happen. Some people here need to give them a chance.
Be Safe,
Jerry Sharpe
#75
Posted 15 July 2012 - 11:22 AM
Full disclosure: i've known the DD for my whole career and have worked for him (as a street agent) as both an ASAC and SAC, so I'm not objective. But I can tell you unequivocally he is an extremely hard working, experienced, dedicated "street agent" oriented guy, and above all a man of integrity. Pisses me off to see him and Mr. Jones dissed here.
In my 23 years as an agent, I have never had reason to be optimistic about the top ATF management trying to do the right thing. Until now. I believe these guys are actively advocating for better bosses and trying to change the in-bred messed up culture of ATF Supervision, a soup sandwich that's been the norm for years and years. A huge job, admittedly. But they are truly trying to make it happen. Some people here need to give them a chance.
Be Safe,
Jerry Sharpe
#76
Posted 09 July 2012 - 09:41 AM
If you were a sales manager and your sales were down from last month and moreover the last year you would most likely have to answer to your boss. Or perhaps a more relevant comparison e.g. NYPD COMPSTAT. But since ATF managers engage in the practice known as logrolling no one is ever called on the carpet. If it weren't for those adoption cases a good arguement could be made for an agency budget reduction - or is that anathema in Congress? Heck, a novel concept is that those adoption cases could be brought directly to a Federal Magistrate from a local cop, who is doing all the heavy lifting anyway, for Federal Prosecution (if deemed necessary) and cut out the Agent steno pool altogether. Has your big city neighborhood becoming safer already from gun play because of PSN?
#77
Posted 07 July 2012 - 07:51 PM
FUBAR, on 07 July 2012 - 07:34 PM, said:
#78
Posted 07 July 2012 - 07:34 PM
leaderofthetards, on 07 July 2012 - 08:08 AM, said:
"While browsing the "grapevine" I came across a narrative concerning "S/A Medrano."
Nathaniel Medrano's situation was well known to NAFA...then NATA...since he was a member and asked us for assistance. In addition to probably suffering from PTSD, his main concern...the one articulated by him...was that he'd received a bum rap...an untrue narrative in the Treasury Waco Repot. You may recall he did a bit of undercover work posing as a UPS employee prior to the predictably ill-fated raid. Some, including Nathaniel, told NAFA personal "honor" is a big deal among folks of Hispanic decent. I assume that's true, but I think "honor" is a big deal for lots of folks irrespective of their ethnicity.
Specifically, Nathaniel wanted an opportunity to personally meet with then Treasury Undersecretary (Law Enforcement) Ron Noble. NATA arranged for that to happen at a NATA annual meeting in Las Vegas, NV which Nathaniel attended. However, at the last minute, Noble sent an underling who did speak privately with Nathaniel. I believe a bit later Nathaniel was able to chat with Noble by phone.
Obviously, Nathaniel's demons were not assuaged by Noble since it was only a matter of a couple weeks later that he took his own life. KK [Madea] also had numerous contacts with Nathaniel in a futile attempt to help him.
I've always considered Nathaniel Medrano to be the 5th ATF Waco fatality. Anyone who has been in combat as I and many others have know not all the casualties happen in the field."
#79 Guest_leaderofthetards_*
Posted 07 July 2012 - 08:08 AM
"While browsing the "grapevine" I came across a narrative concerning "S/A Medrano."
Nathaniel Medrano's situation was well known to NAFA...then NATA...since he was a member and asked us for assistance. In addition to probably suffering from PTSD, his main concern...the one articulated by him...was that he'd received a bum rap...an untrue narrative in the Treasury Waco Repot. You may recall he did a bit of undercover work posing as a UPS employee prior to the predictably ill-fated raid. Some, including Nathaniel, told NAFA personal "honor" is a big deal among folks of Hispanic decent. I assume that's true, but I think "honor" is a big deal for lots of folks irrespective of their ethnicity.
Specifically, Nathaniel wanted an opportunity to personally meet with then Treasury Undersecretary (Law Enforcement) Ron Noble. NATA arranged for that to happen at a NATA annual meeting in Las Vegas, NV which Nathaniel attended. However, at the last minute, Noble sent an underling who did speak privately with Nathaniel. I believe a bit later Nathaniel was able to chat with Noble by phone.
Obviously, Nathaniel's demons were not assuaged by Noble since it was only a matter of a couple weeks later that he took his own life. KK [Madea] also had numerous contacts with Nathaniel in a futile attempt to help him.
I've always considered Nathaniel Medrano to be the 5th ATF Waco fatality. Anyone who has been in combat as I and many others have know not all the casualties happen in the field."
#80 Guest_leaderofthetards_*
Posted 06 July 2012 - 08:04 AM
Everyone can do something. Believe me, those bastards scurrying around HQ and the OCC are doing something and we all know what that means.....some agent is about to get screwed somewhere.
madea, on 05 July 2012 - 05:48 PM, said:
All of you newcomers to the world of fighting this agency’s corruption, please recognize the outstanding work by individuals who proceeded you. Also note that neither Billy or JJ gave up the good fight after they retired and neither of these men felt it necessary to constantly portray themselves as heros who should be memorialized by Hollywood.
Everyone needs to do their part for no other reason than it’s the right thing to do. NAFA has been doing the right thing all these years. Let’s support them. Believe me, if you stay in this agency long enough, you will need them at some point.
#81 Guest_madea_*
Posted 05 July 2012 - 05:48 PM
All of you newcomers to the world of fighting this agency’s corruption, please recognize the outstanding work by individuals who proceeded you. Also note that neither Billy or JJ gave up the good fight after they retired and neither of these men felt it necessary to constantly portray themselves as heros who should be memorialized by Hollywood.
Everyone needs to do their part for no other reason than it’s the right thing to do. NAFA has been doing the right thing all these years. Let’s support them. Believe me, if you stay in this agency long enough, you will need them at some point.
#82
Posted 02 July 2012 - 11:41 PM
HAPPY 4TH AND GOD BLESS AMERICA
leaderofthetards, on 01 July 2012 - 04:24 PM, said:
As for how ATF tries to explain what has been 'done to' Thomasson, that should be interesting reading. And I'm already laughing just imagining what our brilliant "leaders" will do to show the OIG what they are doing to ensure that retaliation stops. Let me guess.....make Thomasson AD of I.A.?
Todd and Brandon - you two are doing a bang up job! First the 'Crenshaw standard' and now the 'Thomasson Standard'. I shudder to think what you two clowns will come up with next.
http://www.grassley....retaliation.pdf
#83 Guest_leaderofthetards_*
Posted 01 July 2012 - 04:24 PM
As for how ATF tries to explain what has been 'done to' Thomasson, that should be interesting reading. And I'm already laughing just imagining what our brilliant "leaders" will do to show the OIG what they are doing to ensure that retaliation stops. Let me guess.....make Thomasson AD of I.A.?
Todd and Brandon - you two are doing a bang up job! First the 'Crenshaw standard' and now the 'Thomasson Standard'. I shudder to think what you two clowns will come up with next.
http://www.grassley....retaliation.pdf
#84
Posted 26 June 2012 - 10:01 AM
#85
Posted 26 June 2012 - 06:29 AM
http://www.nytimes.c...?pagewanted=all
"In April 1972 President Richard Nixon appointed Caulfield as Assistant Director: Criminal Enforcement - Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. Caulfield was placed in charge of over 1,500 Federal agents. John Dean wrote that John Ehrlichman had hoped Caulfield could use the post to "influence how both friends and enemies of the White House were treated by the Internal Revenue Service."
NYPD Shield # 911
#86
Posted 12 June 2012 - 08:22 PM
http://www.wnd.com/2...ism-in-america/
I think ATF should start a task force like they did with the church fires to address these attacks
#87
Posted 30 May 2012 - 03:04 PM
It does beg to question why the entire Oakland Field Office hasn't seized 90 guns (which is what a handful of skilled UC operators did in approximately 4 months) in the last five years under the leadership of Lindsey, Gleysteen, Martin, Vind, Lee and Herkins et al? But for a couple highly motivated Agents under questionable leadership and a real slug ex FIC, Oakland has produced NIL prior to the arrival of Gideon III. Bet they wish the Gideon folks could stay.
#88
Posted 28 May 2012 - 07:59 AM
#89 Guest_madea_*
Posted 21 May 2012 - 06:50 PM
Iceman, on 21 May 2012 - 03:09 PM, said:
#90
Posted 21 May 2012 - 03:09 PM
#91
Posted 13 May 2012 - 12:00 AM
Sandy Davis, on 12 May 2012 - 07:31 AM, said:
Far be it from me to give legal advice to a sitting U.S. Attorney, but I feel compelled to point out to you Mr. Jones that when you brought Kelvin back, you set a standard that you now have to live with. And every time ATF’s leaders go after someone in the field for petty and/or made-up violations, they may as well shout from the rooftops that only non-managers are going to be disciplined.
For those of you who want to post something, but still have the good sense to be intimidated, I will gladly post for you. sandraedavis@bellsouth.net
#92 Guest_madea_*
Posted 12 May 2012 - 07:51 AM
The second movie is called, “Morons from Outer Space”. I don’t think I need to say anymore other than this movie will show you how you appear to the field. Enjoy boys.........love from Madea
#93 Guest_Sandy Davis_*
Posted 12 May 2012 - 07:31 AM
Far be it from me to give legal advice to a sitting U.S. Attorney, but I feel compelled to point out to you Mr. Jones that when you brought Kelvin back, you set a standard that you now have to live with. And every time ATF’s leaders go after someone in the field for petty and/or made-up violations, they may as well shout from the rooftops that only non-managers are going to be disciplined.
For those of you who want to post something, but still have the good sense to be intimidated, I will gladly post for you. sandraedavis@bellsouth.net
#94 Guest_madea_*
Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:06 AM
"Our deeds, good or evil, follow us like shadows". -Buddha
No wonder you two don't want to look back.
#95 Guest_leaderofthetards_*
Posted 11 May 2012 - 03:35 PM
The Shadow, on 11 May 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:
Thank you Shadow. Now that I know what ATF Order 2130.1 says, and we are "required to know the standards and rules of conduct and to seek clarification when doubt exists", consider me seeking. Mr. Jones and Mr. Brandon, please clarify the following:
Are we supposed to have sex with our subordinates or are we not even supposed to mention it if our secretary has spilled coffee on her blouse?
Should we report corruption or should we coverup for those who are involved in the corruption?
Do we give criminals assault weapons, or do we take them away from criminals?
Are strip clubs at lunch ok as long as we can find our GOV?
Can we use the gov credit card for personal use as long as we pay it back before someone catches us? Do we have to be a certain grade before we are allowed to borrow without asking first? How much can we “borrow” before we get into trouble?
Can we beat our wives or is that still a ‘no-no’? (yep - we have some SESers who whack their better halves around). Do we have to be a certain grade before we can beat them?
If we hole up in our homes with a hostage and hold off a swat team for hours, is that ok as long as we don’t actually shoot anyone? (Yep, this happened. This guy is in D.C. today)
And the one I am the most confused about, just who can we lie to? And please be specific. Can we lie to Congress, the OIG, judges, and the American public as long as we tell I.A. the truth? Does one have to be an SES or an ATF attorney to lie to any of the above with impunity? If we lie in conjunction with covering up for one of you people, do we automatically get a promotion?
Now Mr. Brandon and Mr. Jones, I sincerely do understand why you do not want us to look back. That’s some really ugly shit back there. But maybe if you two would clarify some of these issues, we wouldn’t be looking back so much trying to figure out what in the hell you want from us and what in the hell you could possibly be thinking given your actions. And what in the hell are all these attorneys being paid for if THIS is the best they can come up with?
#96
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:04 PM
madea, on 11 May 2012 - 10:28 AM, said:
Ok, Madea is still pondering these latest developments. Was an investigation conducted into the statements made by Jay in this memo? It would seem that a sitting U.S. Attorney (if you’ve forgotten, that would be you Todd) would make a determination as to whether or not the statements Jay made were true. Did I.A. or the OIG investigate whether or not Torres perjured himself and committed acts of corruption? Are you telling me that U.S. Attorney Jones would sanction a suspension and once again VIOLATE an employee’s due process rights? Oh tell me it’s not so. Considering how many requests I have personally made asking for investigations on upper management, Madea just can not believe this could possibly be the case. Now, I know Julie Torres did not investigate whether or not John Torres committed perjury. After all they’re on the new Diversity Panel together. And how uncomfortable would that be?
#98 Guest_madea_*
Posted 11 May 2012 - 10:28 AM
Ok, Madea is still pondering these latest developments. Was an investigation conducted into the statements made by Jay in this memo? It would seem that a sitting U.S. Attorney (if you’ve forgotten, that would be you Todd) would make a determination as to whether or not the statements Jay made were true. Did I.A. or the OIG investigate whether or not Torres perjured himself and committed acts of corruption? Are you telling me that U.S. Attorney Jones would sanction a suspension and once again VIOLATE an employee’s due process rights? Oh tell me it’s not so. Considering how many requests I have personally made asking for investigations on upper management, Madea just can not believe this could possibly be the case. Now, I know Julie Torres did not investigate whether or not John Torres committed perjury. After all they’re on the new Diversity Panel together. And how uncomfortable would that be?
The Shadow, on 11 May 2012 - 08:52 AM, said:
Based on the history of unpunished deeds by ATF managers and supervisors, acceptable role model behavior apparently: includes using the government credit card for personal gain, personal relationships with subordinate females within your immediate chain of command, use of government vehicles to stimulate the economy at strip clubs, smuggling firearms on aircraft for professional athletes, use of ATF personnel as free bodyguards for personal friends, frequent memory losses of on duty incidents without lack of candor charges, self authoring magazine articles that divulged ATF covert recording equipment, alerting the media to ATF covert investigative training/techniques, destroying public safety equipment for personal gain, sleeping on duty, etc., etc., etc...
#99
Posted 11 May 2012 - 08:52 AM
FUBAR, on 11 May 2012 - 06:54 AM, said:
AT one time there was guidance in ATF Order 2130.1 – Conduct and Accountability. 2. RESPONSIBILITIES. Managers and supervisors are expected to serve as role models for all Bureau employees and, by their actions, set standards for appropriate behavior. Employees are required to know the standards and rules of conduct and to seek clarification from their supervisors when doubt exists.
Based on the history of unpunished deeds by ATF managers and supervisors, acceptable role model behavior apparently: includes using the government credit card for personal gain, personal relationships with subordinate females within your immediate chain of command, use of government vehicles to stimulate the economy at strip clubs, smuggling firearms on aircraft for professional athletes, use of ATF personnel as free bodyguards for personal friends, frequent memory losses of on duty incidents without lack of candor charges, self authoring magazine articles that divulged ATF covert recording equipment, alerting the media to ATF covert investigative training/techniques, destroying public safety equipment for personal gain, sleeping on duty, etc., etc., etc...
#100
Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:54 AM
madea, on 11 May 2012 - 06:17 AM, said:
Ok, Madea is confused. Is this yet another incident of an employee disciplined for telling the truth? Is HQ confused between telling the truth and lack of candor? This appears to be just another effort by Todd and Tom to intimidate. Way to go Tom. Good job Todd.
Oh, by the way Tom, Madea was just at a meeting for the southwest side of Detroit. The subject of gun violence came up and the lack of law enforcement. Don’t worry, several of the moderators assured the residents that agencies within the DOJ would soon be arriving to save the day. Be sure to distribute the limited addition Mighty Mouse iphones to the agents in Detroit. We can’t wait for the help. And please Tom, make sure this time that ATF takes the guns AWAY from the criminals instead of giving more guns TO them. By the way Tom, no one from your Detroit office was at the meeting. You may want to remind them that their cars have headlights. Thanks again Tom for your fine job in Detroit.
Jay, since Tom will likely be your BDO, I’m sure this will all go away. Remember the Crenshaw Standard. According to an initial decision that we received from the MSPB, Kelvin had several charges including lack of candor and failure to report misconduct. And of course, we all know what Kelvin got, NOTHING but a letter. Yes sir, Captain Underpants got out his cape and flew right back to work. I’m sure Tom will clear this all up for you Jay. And please Jay, when you see Tom, would you ask him if he has found package #1 yet? Remember, that employee told the truth too.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











