Goldfish

Of course I'm a day late responding to "Fatuousman" (I'm sorry...I mean "Wiseman's") response to this discussion before he requested that his account be canceled. It's always been interesting to me how some people can dish it out but just not take it. I'm sure he is still cruising this website under an anonymous account. Mr. Wiseman's response is a running contradiction of words. Does Wiseman like "Jay-bird" (good use of his nickname to make it look like they are friends)? It doesn't seem like he does like him because in the next sentence he refers to him as Mr. Undercover (I'm pretty sure his last name is Dobyns) and says he likes to brag about his undercover adventures. That is not the Agent Dobyns I know but since Wiseman is on a nickname basis with him I guess I don't know anything. Mr. Wiseman needs to understand that the only way that the "blunders that could or should have been avoided" are fixed is if those who are mistreated have to courage to stand up and fight for what is right. These cases mentioned on this website naming the unethical and unlawful treatment of agents are not solely for the promotion of those individual agents but for changing what is wrong with this agency and providing all agents the security that the mistreatment won't happen to them in the future. Lastly, if Mr. Wiseman actually is "locking up 5 armed career criminals" then he deserves a pat on the the back and a job well done. However, "road kill", adopted and PSN cases don't count.