http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EEOC-2014-0001
Heres a chance to be heard. New regs. for MD 110? Ya think?
Posted 07 April 2014 - 10:51 AM
http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EEOC-2014-0001
Heres a chance to be heard. New regs. for MD 110? Ya think?
Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:43 AM
Posted 28 October 2012 - 10:45 PM
Posted 27 October 2012 - 08:54 AM
Posted 26 October 2012 - 08:22 PM
Posted 24 October 2012 - 08:31 PM
The motion of summary judgment is the thing that everyone seems to be unable to survive.
Anyone out there knows how to respond to a motion of summary judgment? What needs to be done and does anyone have a successful go-by?
How is it survived? They count on the fact that the lawyers know and we do not.
Posted 17 October 2012 - 12:21 PM
Posted 17 October 2012 - 11:51 AM
Posted 07 October 2012 - 09:00 PM
Posted 19 August 2012 - 02:03 PM
I just recently won my EEO case against some of the worst managers ATF has ever hired. They lied and stuck together in their joint efforts to win their case. However, they underestimated an educated Latina!
They are not "God" and mean nothing...nothing but a joke! If you are involved in an EEO battle, do all the above and then hire an attorney. They will shake in their panties. Take charge of your situation, don't let it take charge of you. If you must quit, then quit.
- I documented everything!
- I carried a journal with me at all times.
- I recorded conversations and meetings.
- I printed my emails.
- I collected my own statements.
- I had my recordings transcribed.
- I was calm, cool and collected.
- I stayed professional.
- I hired an attorney.
- I did my research and never let management get away with anything.
Posted 18 August 2012 - 11:36 AM
Attention anyone who has a pending discrimination complaint - the agency has an important deadline to meet. AFTER you file the Formal Complaint, the agency must complete it’s investigation within 180 days. If your complaint has passed the 180 days, you should immediately send a request for a hearing to the nearest EEOC. You can find your EEOC office at EEOC.gov.
DO NOT wait pass the 180 days to take action on this. You will be making the situation worse. Additional acts will be taken against you and the EEOC Judge will question YOU as to why you waited to ask for a hearing.
VISITING is dead on. Pay Attention and you will force the agency to play by the rules. And they are NOT very good at that.
Be aware that there are TWO show-cause orders issued at this time to the agency asking why there should not be sanctions imposed. Both of these show-cause orders involve ATF ignoring deadlines. Maybe the EEOC is FINALLY fed up with the negligence of Stacy Brouckman’s office.
Also, if you have an ROI that only contains crap, document what is missing and report that to the EEOC judge. The people in Stacy’s office are working hand in hand with management and the OCC to ensure that you can’t win. Make a move now to protect yourself.
Posted 18 August 2012 - 11:34 AM
Posted 17 August 2012 - 12:52 PM
Posted 27 June 2012 - 05:45 AM
Posted 05 August 2011 - 05:17 PM
Very true - It has happened in many cases that either an attorney dropped the ball, a judge was merely a puppet for the gov, or agents just wore out and could no longer deal with or afford all the litigation. Some of us were very lucky in how things fell into place. I'm afraid that isn't really the norm. Sandy
Posted 13 July 2011 - 07:33 PM
for those of you interested in the EEO judge she is working with someone already. US Rep Conyers has already been briefed. Also one EEOC judge is under scrutiny now. A second will be outed soon. Motions charging retaliation by ATF attorneys have been filed. Busy, busy, busy. Join in to straighten out the system. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. A third judge could be challenged but the person chooses not to do so. Takes courage to take on the real perpetrators of injustice. Also, don't ever count your money too soon. Others with "great" cases lost everything. Mike Casali lost at the EEOC but won at MSPB with Gail Dickinson. Never underestimate the Agency and the judge. Be cautious.
Posted 13 July 2011 - 04:33 PM
Posted 08 July 2011 - 03:39 PM
Posted 09 June 2011 - 06:56 AM
Apparently Ms. Loos had a little insider trading information. Listen to the attached interview. I am told this FORMER EEOC Judge is approachable and will provide documetation that the EEOC system is stacked against you.
www.blogtalkradio.com/4justice/2011/06/07/gangster-government-usa-an-eeoc-judge-tells-all
Posted 08 June 2011 - 08:25 PM
The motion of summary judgment is the thing that everyone seems to be unable to survive.
Anyone out there knows how to respond to a motion of summary judgment? What needs to be done and does anyone have a successful go-by?
How is it survived? They count on the fact that the lawyers know and we do not.
Posted 21 May 2011 - 08:32 AM
Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:44 AM
Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:25 AM
Posted 22 April 2011 - 06:29 AM
Posted 15 April 2011 - 04:40 PM
Posted 09 April 2011 - 09:46 AM
Posted 08 March 2011 - 08:40 PM
Posted 05 March 2011 - 10:23 AM
Posted 03 March 2011 - 11:58 AM
Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:00 PM
Posted 03 February 2011 - 11:06 PM
Posted 25 January 2011 - 10:20 PM
Posted 24 January 2011 - 07:45 PM
Posted 23 January 2011 - 10:22 AM
Posted 05 January 2011 - 07:25 AM
Posted 23 December 2010 - 09:21 AM
THE QUESTION OF THE DAY TO ALL AT ATF IS THIS: IF THE COMPLAINTANTS AND THEIR DISPUTES ARE UNWARRANTED THEN WHY DOES ATF WORK SO HARD TO KEEP DOCUMENTS CONCEALED AND WITNESSES FROM TESTIFYING. IF ATF DID NOTHING WRONG IN ALL THESE DISPUTES DOESN'T IT MAKE SENSE FOR ATF TO TAKE AN ATTITUDE OF "HERE ARE THE DOCS AND HERE ARE OUR WITNESSES" AND SIMPLY SHOW THAT THE RETALIATION OR BAD CONDUCT ALLEGED IS NOT ACCURATE? WHY DO THEY CONCEAL AND FIGHT SO HARD TO KEEP THE VICTIMS FROM BEING ABLE TO LEARN THE TRUTH? WE KNOW WHY.Mr.Traver and Mr. Melson, I have provided the following definitions, not out of disrespect but as a reminder. Stop pretending you are complying with the ADR and mediation requirments, because you ARE NOT. Again,you lied to Anderson Cooper and you are lying to the tax paying public.STOP pretending that you want to resolve internal strife. You have NO intention beyond complying with the letter of the law. Just stop. How can you ignore the ongoing and in fact increased morale issues and stepped up reprisals.
RAC Quinonez, Agent Dobyns. Text book reprisals.McMahon is either a puppet or a coward. Ray Charles can see what Newell and Gillette have perpetrated. Remove them.
An attempt to bring about a peaceful settlement or compromise between disputants through the objective intervention of a neutral party.
GOOD FAITH
Honestly and without deception. An agreement might be declared invalid if one of the parties entered with the intention of defrauded the other.The duty of each party to an agreement (and all officers, employees, or agents of each party) to act in a fair and equitable manner toward each other so as to guarantee each party freedom from coercion, intimidation, or threats of coercion or intimidation from the other.
Posted 22 December 2010 - 11:25 PM
Posted 27 November 2010 - 07:50 AM
Posted 23 November 2010 - 11:58 AM
This is excellent advice. Also ask for all email correspondence between ATF Office of EO and DSZ. They like to chat. This issue has just been sent to the OFO as an amendment to an Appeal. The AJ couldn't find any evidence of discrimination in the ROI - when your case is dismissed for that reason you now have an explanation that is credible. Let's see what the OFO does with this one.ATF GETS THE OPPOSING TEAMS PLAYBOOK.
If you have an EEOC case pending, and after you have received the Investigative file prepared for ATF by DSZ, FOIA or DEMAND in discovery, the Investigative plan submitted by the investigator,through DSZ to ATF EEOC. THAT'S RIGHT, before DSZ does the first interview, ATF has the play book. Now the question is, does ATF EEOC give chief counsel OR the manager named in the complaint advanced notice of how they must defend the allegation. To make this simple, its like forwarding a suspect in one of you cases your investigative strategy. Remember ATF EEOC gets and is allowed to respond to the plan, Before the complainant has been interviewed. Also be aware that in many cases DSZ does NOT personally interview the managers. In many cases, they just send written questions and then the manager and an ATF attorney answer the questions and send them back.
Posted 06 November 2010 - 08:27 AM
Posted 24 October 2010 - 07:15 AM
Posted 24 October 2010 - 06:21 AM
Posted 21 October 2010 - 10:07 PM
This is a much more complicated issue than I first thought it was. I cannot understand why the Obama administration keeps Melson in place and refuses to name a Director when there is such a dangerous situation on the Mexican border. Something does not add up here. The unfortunate situation is that there is a percentage of individuals in ATF who "like it like it is". And that percentage is holding all of the "power" slots right now. They will not give it up by just walking away. When Hoover continues to take care of people like York, there is no integrity in the organization.WE ARE PAYING ATTENTION MR.MELSON. WE WANT OUR BUREAU BACK.
Posted 21 October 2010 - 03:28 PM
WE ARE PAYING ATTENTION MR.MELSON. WE WANT OUR BUREAU BACK.Over fifteen thousand views to this topic page alone! Not fifteen hundred - 15,000! Over 100,000 views of the website. Melson you think no one is paying attention to what you are up to? You think that everyone is buying off on your three webcasts and now everything is OK? You may not be soley responsible for this trainwreck of management but you are most definately a huge part of ignoring fixing it.
Ask to step down or aside. Take all the AD's with you when you go. What bigger vote of "no confidence" do you guys need to see?
Posted 21 October 2010 - 03:27 PM
WE ARE PAYING ATTENTION MR.MELSON. WE WANT OUR BUREAU BACK.Over fifteen thousand views to this topic page alone! Not fifteen hundred - 15,000! Over 100,000 views of the website. Melson you think no one is paying attention to what you are up to? You think that everyone is buying off on your three webcasts and now everything is OK? You may not be soley responsible for this trainwreck of management but you are most definately a huge part of ignoring fixing it.
Ask to step down or aside. Take all the AD's with you when you go. What bigger vote of "no confidence" do you guys need to see?
Posted 21 October 2010 - 06:55 AM
I went to the EEOC website and realized that they have their own OIG. I sent them an email yesterday asking whether they would investigate the actions of individual agencies as well as the EEOC. I am waiting to get a response from them. If they ignore the email, then we have something more to go to Congress with.Mr. Melson and the Exec. Staff, we are law law enforcement agency. We should not have to stoop to the tactics in the last post. You should also quit tyrying to backdoor complainants by holding up security clearances for trivial crap. Its undignified. As is placing agents on indeterminate periods of restricted duty. Due process applies to agents too. Ypou are looking petty and inviting more media and congressional scrutiny. Mr. Melson handle this bad business or FLEOA and the media will.
Posted 21 October 2010 - 06:43 AM
Posted 20 October 2010 - 10:54 PM
Posted 20 October 2010 - 06:58 PM
Posted 12 October 2010 - 09:41 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users